Thank you for your suggestion. I will switch to the Eclipse Galileo. At the moment, with the INDINGO release, I found a work around that consists in replacing the version property in the report tag in the .rptdesign file as follows:
change the file generated by INDINGO eclipse <report xmlns="http://www.eclipse.org/birt/2005/design"; version="3.2.22" id="1"> with the following <report xmlns="http://www.eclipse.org/birt/2005/design"; version="3.2.15" id="1"> This seems to work so far. -Bruno 2011/11/27 Ravindra Mandre <[email protected]> > I worked in 2.5 version using galileo and it works like charm. > i also tried to install INDIGO , it was giving some error (not remembered > :( ) > so switched back to galileo . > > > Ravindra Mandre > > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:05 AM, BJ Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > have you followed the example file. > > in ofbiz you must call the file through the contoller view > > > > Bruno Busco sent the following on 11/26/2011 5:34 AM: > > > Hi, > > > I am trying to write some OFBiz report using BIRT. > > > I installed the INDINGO release of Eclipse and then the BIRT package. > > > > > > The version of the BIRT package I got is 3.7.1 but the rtpdesign files > > > generated with this tool does not seem to be compatible with the BIRT > > > engine that is embedded into OFBiz (version 2.6). > > > > > > I got this error when I simply open and save again one of the OFBiz > OOTB > > > provided .rptdesign files. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > Nov 26, 2011 2:12:39 PM > > > org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.api.impl.ReportEngineHelper > > > getReportDesignHandle > > > SEVERE: invalid design file <stream> > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > > > I tryed to install an older BIRT package into Eclipse INDINGO but the > > > oldest available to install is version 3.7.0 whish I guess would give > the > > > same problem. > > > > > > Has anybody any advice to solve the problem? > > > What is the OFBiz BIRT compatible report development toolchain ? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Bruno Busco > > > > > >
