BJ Freeman/All,

We are mainly into zkoss framework (and have integrated well with ofbiz),
but still I find a lot of pain while creating service wrappers in zk over
ofbiz services.
Would like to know your suggestions if we should go with Screen/Widget for
front end design or zkoss is better.

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:10 PM, BJ Freeman <[email protected]> wrote:

> the best way to learn widget is use a xml editor that will give you each
> valid element as you build the file.
> you can also read the Schema file for the widget and the comments buried
> in them.
> FTL is how to build files to have it rendered has html.
> you marshal the data for the ftl through the grovy files.
> if you use screen widgets you can fall the grooby from there.
> otherwise name the groovy the same as the FTl file and it will be executed
> before the FTL is called.
> there are plenty of examples in code.
> expect about a year to learn all the in and outs of ofbiz, minimum.
>
> G.Ben sent the following on 5/31/2012 12:51 AM:
>
>  Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm having some issues with OFBiz and its tutorials, it's not quite enough
>> for me, because I'm developping a real application with it,
>> So, I need to know the syntax of that language, for example : the ui
>> labels
>> how and what do we use them for ? a HTML page without Ui labels should it
>> be
>> enough ??
>> And the form widget, what is syntax that we should follow (for example :
>> to
>> put an image ? to put a file in attachement etc ... )
>> And for style, do we always use CSS, if yes, is it like CSS with HTML ...
>> I have a few knowledge about OFBiz and i'm really struggling with it ... I
>> keep googling and I don't find simple things.
>>
>> P.S : Excuse me if my english is not that good.
>>
>> Thank you for your help.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> G.Ben
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.**
>> com/Tips-or-a-cookbook-**tp4632835.html<http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Tips-or-a-cookbook-tp4632835.html>
>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Deepak Agarwal,
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to