Please send to me too. On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ruth Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 7/17/12 6:21 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> From: "Ruth Hoffman" <[email protected]> >> >>> By the time I get into a project and this sort of thing comes up, the >>> competition has long since be bested by OFBiz and all the other cool >>> features it offers. >>> >> Arg, sorry I don't get this sentence (tried twice to read ;o). I mean >> << >> > By the time I get involved with an implementation of OFBiz, there is no > competition. OFBiz is already the selected platform for all the reasons we > know about. The list of reasons why OFBiz gets selected is too long to > enumerate here. I wrote a marketing piece called the "OFBiz Top 10. Why you > should consider OFBiz for your next enterprise software endeavor". It is a > PDF so I can't attach it. But if you want it, let me know. I'll send it to > you. > > This is something that most OFBiz adopters don't understand and/or don't >>> see until much later in the development cycle - if at all. >>> >> >> We need Shiro for sure, "we" agreed. What we will need after the slimdown >> effort is to get a consensus between developers about what should be done >> next. And not only, but as some requested already, *a road map*, with tasks >> ordered (and if possible assigned, whisful thinking, I'm an optimist). This >> can stay simple with only big tasks (projects?) referred to, like >> http://blog.jquery.com/2012/**06/28/jquery-core-version-1-9-**and-beyond/<http://blog.jquery.com/2012/06/28/jquery-core-version-1-9-and-beyond/> >> >> Jacques >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Deepak Agarwal, >> >> Paxcel Technologies Pvt Ltd. >> Hartron Complex, Sector 18, Gurgaon, India. >> E-Mail: [email protected] >> Mobile: +91 9910322604 >> >>
