This was added at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=941132
And can be now parametrised in trunk using
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1494464
I don't know more
Jacques
Skip wrote:
> There is this seca:
>
> -eca service="changeOrderStatus" event="commit" run-on-error="false"-
> -condition field-name="orderTypeId" operator="equals"
> value="PURCHASE_ORDER"-
> -condition field-name="statusId" operator="equals"
> value="ORDER_APPROVED"-
> -condition-field field-name="statusId" operator="not-equals"
> to-field-name="oldStatusId/-
> -action service="createPaymentFromOrder" mode="sync" persist="true"-
> -eca-
>
>
> If the order is approved and it is a purchase order, the service
> createPaymentFromOrder is called which creates a payment and a
> OrderPaymentPreference amoung other things.
>
> This is causing me some problems because when the order is received, an
> invoice is created by InvoiceServices.createInvoiceForOrder and around line
> 776 is this line:
>
> List<GenericValue> orderPaymentPrefs =
> delegator.findList("OrderPaymentPreference",
> EntityCondition.makeCondition(paymentPrefConds, EntityOperator.AND), null,
> null, null, false);
>
>
> This returns the above created OrderPaymentPreference and a
> PaymentApplication is created for the payment created above.
>
> There is a bug in this code that miscalculates the amount to apply and I get
> errors like:
>
> Error in service [createPaymentApplication] Tried to apply [692.5] which is
> greater than the outstanding amount [623.25] of invoice [62741].
>
> Now, I dont really care about this bug. In my view, the Payment and
> OrderPaymentPreference should not have been created. In version 9.x, this
> seca did not exist.
>
> My question is what is the purpose? No payment was ever received, it is a
> completely bogus one.
>
> I have commented out the seca and am in the process of writing a service to
> remove all the payments, applications, and OrderPaymentPreference created by
> the above seca.
>
> I am just wondering what the logic here was.
>
> Skip
