I've determined that providing dimensions as selectable features is
appropriate because a dimension feature type already exists as demo
data. I created "diameter length' and "thickness" features with
"dimension" are their parent.
On 02/03/2014 03:09 PM, Christian Carlow wrote:
I'm having difficulty determining how materials that may be ordered at
various dimensions should be modeled. For example, two orders can be
placed to the same supplier for the same part but at different
diameter lengths and thicknesses/depths. I assume that each of the
dimension variations should exist as feature variants of a virtual
material product but wasn't sure if this would be correct since there
are length, width, and depth fields already available for products.
I'm pretty sure those dedicated product dimension fields are used for
shipping purposes but wanted to make sure. Does anyone see a problem
providing the dimensions as selectable features to a virtual product?
