Le 19/09/2014 20:16, Ted Byers a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Ron Wheeler
<[email protected]> wrote:
No one is suggesting using JIRA as part of OFBiz. (As Jacques points out
parts of OFBiz are used in JIRA as a development framework.)
Nor was I. I was just curious about how the workflow features already
in OFbiz compared with what is in Jira (or, in other words, what
Atlassian added).
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Is+OFBiz+for+Me#IsOFBizforMe-OFBizWorkflow(EDAArchitecture)
The suggestion was to use JIRA as an issue tracking system to help manage
the Workflow project.
Ok, not a stretch there as it is already used by ASF.
Adrian suggested to use the ASF Jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ) to handle the communication between the persons interested working
on mixing OFBiz with Activiti
The suggested technical base for Workflow is Activiti (read the start of
this conversation at the end of this page).
OK. But then, I'd be interested in a comparison of Jira with Activiti
with what is already in OFBiz. ;-)
OFBiz uses EDA as explained in the link above. Jira workflow is limited to transitions between status. Activiti is a real workflow engine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activiti_%28software%29
Jacques
