Hi Pierre,

thanks for the answer. I will check. Can you confirm that it should work that 
way? I could not find any doc about it and had to figure it out myself.

Thanks,
Ingo


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Pierre Smits [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Jänner 2015 15:55
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Multiple root apps (tenant)

Ingo,

There were some recent changes committed regarding multi-tenancy functionality.

You might consider doing a quick test against branch 14.12 to narrow it down.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Ingo Wolfmayr <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I would like to run multiple websites on a single instance using the 
> tenant functionality.
>
> In Ofbiz release 13.07 it was working by using virtual hosts:
>
> Root mount for virtual host:
>
>     <webapp name="demo"
>         title="Demo"
>         server="default-server"
>         location="webapp/demo"
>         mount-point="/ "
>         app-bar-display="false">
> <virtual-host host-name="demo.com"/>
> </webapp>
>
> As I want to reuse code/resources from other webapps I did the following:
> for example framework/images
>
> This was necessary to make the images webapp available for all the 
> webapps that already used it:
> <webapp name="images"
>         title="Images"
>         server="default-server"
>         location="webapp/images"
>         mount-point="/images"
>         app-bar-display="false">
> </webapp>
>
> This was necessary to make the images webapp available for the virtual
> host:
> <webapp name="images"
>         title="Images"
>         server="default-server"
>         location="webapp/images"
>         mount-point="/images"
>         app-bar-display="false">
>     <virtual-host host-name="demo.com"/> </webapp>
>
> I tried to migrate to the actual trunk but failed as the virtual host 
> logic seems to work different. As far as I understood (in 13.07), 
> other webapps where only available for a virtualhost if they had a 
> matching virtual host entry as well.
>
> Can someone please help me by telling me how this is done correct.
>
> Best regards,
> Ingo
>

Reply via email to