It may have been a side-effect of cross-posting. The other replies may not have been visible if they were replying from a different list (due to filtering or whatever). It's not uncommon for people to only see pieces of a conversation when cross-posting is involved.
I don't see it as a personal attack to call someone out for repeatedly defying community etiquette. Some references from a quick search, I'm almost certain there's been more: http://markmail.org/message/ycysd436ry2jv4s2 http://markmail.org/message/7gu5m7fidxhw66ew http://markmail.org/message/qgwjvrhltm2sqwkn Not to mention he's starting going further and including the private list in his communications which isn't remotely appropriate and serves zero purpose other than to defy etiquette. If you think there is some other interpretation available, please feel free to share it. Regards Scott On 1 December 2016 at 01:23, Paul Piper <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, but the code of conduct also states that there shouldn't be any form > of > personal address or double posts. Nor should there be any personal attacks > either: > > http://apache.org/dev/contrib-email-tips.html#respect > > All I'm saying is: I think that just like the double post, a single person > response should be enough ;) > > > > --- > Curiously enough, we should not address one another by our gender either, > so > there's that... > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble. > com/ANNOUNCE-Plugin-components-for-OFBiz-and-OFBizBase-tp4699823p4699847. > html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
