Hello Ryan;
Yes 10.04 it's old.
From my experience :
* check you crashed service : when you restart your OFBiz, if you have
some scheduled service, the "crash" duplicate them
* check you java heap space with jmx because when a thread overload
ressources or something like that you have an unexpected result on job
manager
* prefer to use more than one pool if you have too many async service.
* Warning on huge async service. On a big project I down the jobs
authorize on running at only 2. I prefer load the queue instead of
overload the server. And if you service queue is too high, deploy a new
ofbiz to help this pool ;)
Nicolas
Le 01/02/2017 à 18:39, Ryan Moriarty a écrit :
This is OFBiz 10.04. Quite old, I know, but I'm stuck for the moment.
I haven't seen any errors about being able to queue jobs, but I may be
searching for the wrong text
The settings are as they are when I inherited the project, I can't speak to
why they are as they are.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
Le 31/01/2017 à 21:24, Ryan Moriarty a écrit :
I'm having difficulty with asynchronous jobs not completing. Many jobs
finish normally, but most show "Running" into perpetuity. I see no pattern
in services that finish and services that continue running indefinitely. I
have five invoker threads that appear to always be sleeping. We're using a
single-server config. This is my thread pool config:
<thread-pool send-to-pool="pool"
purge-job-days="4"
failed-retry-min="3"
ttl="18000000"
wait-millis="750"
jobs="10"
min-threads="5"
max-threads="15"
poll-enabled="true"
poll-db-millis="20000">
<run-from-pool name="pool"/>
I saw a message that suggested I would be out of heap space, but my max
heap size is 5280M, and we have only ~100 concurrent users, so that
doesn't
seem like an issue. Could it be a deadlock? How would I resolve that? Any
suggestions are welcome.
Ryan Moriarty
Software Developer
Able Aerospace Services
Hi Ryan,
Which OFBiz version are you using?
With jobs=10, don't you ever get "Unable to queue job" exceptions?
And why did you change the default setting at large?
Jacques
