Hi Rajesh,

Could you please share which database you are using?


Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwax.co

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>  Hi ,
>
>
> it was in conversion/DateTimeConverters.java that was appending '.0' to
> the
> end of
> string if the string did not contain any  decimals. So i have now started
> sending
> the fractional seconds. And things are better (if not perfect).
>
>
>
> public java.sql.Timestamp convert(String obj, Locale locale, TimeZone
> timeZone, String formatString) throws ConversionException {
>             String str = obj.trim();
>             if (str.length() == 0) {
>                 return null;
>             }
>             DateFormat df = null;
>             if (UtilValidate.isEmpty(formatString)) {
>                 // These hacks are a bad idea, but they are included
>                 // for backward compatibility.
>                 if (str.length() > 0 && !str.contains(":")) {
>                     str = str + " 00:00:00.00";
>                 }
>                 // hack to mimic Timestamp.valueOf() method
>                 if (str.length() > 0 && !str.contains(".")) {
>                     str = str + ".0";
>                 } else {
>                     // DateFormat has a funny way of parsing milliseconds:
>                     // 00:00:00.2 parses to 00:00:00.002
>                     // so we'll add zeros to the end to get 00:00:00.200
>                     String[] timeSplit = str.split("[.]");
>                     if (timeSplit.length > 1 && timeSplit[1].length() < 3)
> {
>                         str = str + "000".substring(timeSplit[1].
> length());
>                     }
>                 }
>                 df =
> UtilDateTime.toDateTimeFormat(UtilDateTime.getDateTimeFormat(), timeZone,
> locale);
>             } else {
>                 df = UtilDateTime.toDateTimeFormat(formatString, timeZone,
> locale);
>             }
>             try {
>                 return new java.sql.Timestamp(df.parse(str).getTime());
>             } catch (ParseException e) {
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Rishi.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> UtilDateTime is the utility class, add the time format support you want
> >> and
> >> use it. Most format supported by this utility class OFBiz have.
> >>
> >> Rishi Solanki
> >> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> >> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> >> Direct: +91-9893287847
> >> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> >> www.hotwax.co
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Rajesh Mallah <
> mallah.raj...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Now I am passing  "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30" as fromDate ,
> >> > Which is the value picked up from the DB column.
> >> >
> >> > Even at XML level the string is preserved , but at some stage after
> >> > hitting tomcat it becomes: "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30.0"
> >> >
> >> > which is not parseable.
> >> >
> >> >  |W| [ModelService.makeValid] : Type conversion of field [fromDate] to
> >> type
> >> > [java.sql.Timestamp] failed f
> >> > or value "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30":
> >> > org.apache.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException:
> java.text.ParseException:
> >> > Unparseable date: "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30.0"
> (java.text.ParseExceptio
> >> > n: Unparseable date: "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30.0")
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > <!--- snippet from the XML-RPC -->
> >> >
> >> >           <member>
> >> >             <name>fromDate</name>
> >> >             <value>
> >> >               <string><![CDATA[2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30]]></string>
> >> >             </value>
> >> >           </member>
> >> >
> >> > <!-- end of snippet -->
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > regds
> >> > mallah.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Rajesh Mallah <
> >> mallah.raj...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hello Mr Deepak ,
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for the response . The record does exists but i guess
> >> > > i am not specifying the params good enough to hit the record
> >> > > by pkey.
> >> > >
> >> > > I wish there were a "product_price_id" in ProductPrice entity. :-)
> >> > >
> >> > > regds
> >> > > mallah.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Deepak Dixit <
> deepak.di...@hotwax.co
> >> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi Rajesh,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> If you want to create product price you should use
> createProductPrice
> >> > >> service,
> >> > >> https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/Servic
> >> > >> eList?sel_service_name=createProductPrice
> >> > >>
> >> > >> If productPrice record already exists you should use
> >> updateProductPrice,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks & Regards
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Deepak Dixit
> >> > >> Director of Product Engineering
> >> > >> HotWax Commerce <https://hotwax.co/>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Rajesh Mallah <
> >> > mallah.raj...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Hi ,
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I am calling
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/
> >> > >> > ServiceList?sel_service_name=updateProductPrice
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > with ARGS
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > {
> >> > >> >     currencyUomId           "INR",
> >> > >> >     fromDate                "2018-04-16 17:39:52",
> >> > >> >     price                   150,
> >> > >> >     productId               "PROD_SW52D5H3EN",
> >> > >> >     productPricePurposeId   "PURCHASE",
> >> > >> >     productPriceTypeId      "DEFAULT_PRICE",
> >> > >> >     productStoreGroupId     "_NA_",
> >> > >> >     taxInPrice              "Y",
> >> > >> >     termUomId               "WT_kg"
> >> > >> > }
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I am getting error:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > faultString:Error running the simple-method: Entity value not
> found
> >> > with
> >> > >> > name: lookedUpValue Method = updateProductPrice, File =
> >> > >> > file:/opt/ofbiz/apache-ofbiz-16.11.04/applications/product/
> >> > >> > minilang/product/price/PriceServices.xml,
> >> > >> > Element = <set-nonpk-fields>, Line 69null
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > the minilang def is reproduced here for convinience:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >  <simple-method method-name="updateProductPrice"
> >> > >> short-description="Update
> >> > >> > an ProductPrice">
> >> > >> >         <set field="callingMethodName"
> value="updateProductPrice"/>
> >> > >> >         <set field="checkAction" value="UPDATE"/>
> >> > >> >         <call-simple-method method-name="
> >> > checkProductRelatedPermission"
> >> > >> > xml-resource="component://product/minilang/product/
> >> > >> > product/ProductServices.xml"/>
> >> > >> >         <check-permission permission="CATALOG_PRICE_MAINT">
> >> > >> >             <fail-property resource="ProductUiLabels"
> >> > >> > property="ProductPriceMaintPermissionError"/>
> >> > >> >         </check-permission>
> >> > >> >         <check-errors/>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >         <call-simple-method method-name="
> >> > inlineHandlePriceWithTaxInclud
> >> > >> > ed"/>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >         <entity-one entity-name="ProductPrice"
> >> > >> > value-field="lookedUpValue"/>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >         <!-- grab the old price value before setting nonpk
> >> parameter
> >> > >> fields
> >> > >> > -->
> >> > >> >         <field-to-result field="lookedUpValue.price"
> >> > >> > result-name="oldPrice"/>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >         <set-nonpk-fields map="parameters"
> >> > value-field="lookedUpValue"/>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >         <now-timestamp field="nowTimestamp"/>
> >> > >> >         <set field="lookedUpValue.lastModifiedDate"
> >> > >> > from-field="nowTimestamp"/>
> >> > >> >         <set field="lookedUpValue.lastModifiedByUserLogin"
> >> > >> > from-field="userLogin.userLoginId"/>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >         <store-value value-field="lookedUpValue"/>
> >> > >> >  </simple-method>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > The productID does exists in Entity ProductPrice
> >> > >> > Where am I going wrong ?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > thanks & regds
> >> > >> > Rajesh Mallah.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to