Hi,
In dev ML, we discussed the change of "default ordering of webapps titles" in
main menu: https://markmail.org/message/ftgfpwztflty7klb
I started the implementation with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12166. It's already used in trunk
demo.
I now want to discuss that more openly in user ML because obviously we are all
concerned.
One thing can't be achieved using the position webapp attribute: the position
of webtools. Because it is secondary. I changed that too.
If you don't agree with these changes please let us know, why, and what you
propose else. Beware: bikeshedding will not be accepted :)
Thanks
Jacques
Le 21/10/2020 à 07:11, Pritam Kute a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
The order of menus which you are suggesting looks good to me as well.
Kind Regards,
--
Pritam Kute
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:52 PM James Yong <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jacques,
The order of the application list looks fine to me. Understand we can
still override the ordering if there is client requirement.
Regard,
James
On 2020/10/15 10:33:40 Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I propose this order (did my best but quickly, could have missed
things), applications 1st:
1. partymgr(because you need parties to do anything)
2. catalog (because you need products to do anything)
3. facility (because you need to store products to do anything)
4. order (because it's there that things begin to "move")
5. accounting (because it's there that things "end"; ar & ap should
disappear)
6. content (because you need to associate contents to make things
better)
7. manufacturing (because OFBiz is also an ERP)
8. sfa (because people are often looking for a CRM, BTW most them don't
know what SFA is)
9. workeffort (this one could be above, but it's not obvious for most
people)
10. humanres (more important than below IMO)
11. marketing (not sure about the place of this one)
12. webtools (maybe higher?)
------------- (plugins start below)
1. rest (could be named api soon)
2. projectmgr
3. webpos
4. bi
5. birt
6. myportal
7. assetmaint
8. ismgr
9. scrum
10. solr
11. ebay
12. firstdata
13. ------------- (those are special, maybe above?)
14. example
15. exampleext
------------- (those plugins don't show atm but exist, maybe need more
info from backend menu?)
1. ecommerce
2. ecomseo
3. multiflex
4. cmssite
5. ebaystore
6. ldap
7. lucene
8. passport
9. pricat
10. msggateway
Please let me know your thoughts, TIA
Jacques
Le 11/10/2020 à 10:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi James,
I'd like to define an order for webapps in function of their OOTB
importance. If we agree we should discuss the OOTB order of importance of
applications webapps and then plugins.
I think we can quickly agree, and hope it would not open a Pandora box
:)
Also the feature should be easily changed by custom projects. Maybe
documentation for that would be enough.
Jacques
Le 11/10/2020 à 06:37, James Yong a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
What kind of ordering are you looking for the webapp menu items?
Customer specific ordering?
Regards,
James
On 2020/10/08 10:34:08, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
Today Deepak answered on user ML
https://markmail.org/message/syzvyyueheejyyce how to order webapps titles
in main menu.
BTW OOTB it would work for <webapp name="order" only if you do the
same in birt where there is a 2nd <webapp name="order" ;)
I think we already discussed that in the past but I don't clearly
remember the result and I'd like to be sure about that.
Should we not order webapps by default?
For instance I don't like much to have firstdatapaymentgateway
visible at the top in the main bar for the default theme.
And globally having more important apps in 1st places would be
better.
What do you think?
Jacques
