Hi Ilma,
Your message has been moderated, else it would not have reached this Mailing
List.
Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email
client.
See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
You will get a better support, people can answer you on the ML.
The wider the audience the better the answers you might get.
Also it's more work for moderators who have to accept your messages as long as
you have not subscribed.
I'll personally no longer accept them (other moderators still could).
Thanks
This said, I hope someone will answer you with details.
Else you may create a Jira issue following:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices#OFBizContributorsBestPractices-HowtocreateaJiraissue
HTH
Jacques
Le 08/05/2025 à 14:19, Ilma masroor a écrit :
Dear OFBiz Community,
I hope this message finds you well.
I am currently working with the BOM simulation feature in Apache OFBiz and
have encountered an issue that I hope to get some guidance on.
When using the *Explosion* type in BOM simulation, all components are
correctly displayed with their properly calculated quantities. However,
when switching to *Implosion*, I am able to retrieve the finished product
that can be obtained from the provided raw materials, but the *resulting
quantity appears to be incorrect*. Specifically, the system is returning
the same amount of finished product as the raw material input, which
is *arithmetically
inaccurate* based on the defined BOM.
To troubleshoot this, I have ensured the following:
-
BOM is properly established.
-
Manufacturing rules are correctly defined.
-
I have completed the full manufacturing flow in another trial, including
BOM, Routing, Routing Tasks, MRP, Purchase Order for the required product,
and Job Shop Execution.
Despite all this, the implosion simulation still gives incorrect output
quantities.
Could anyone please advise on what might be causing this discrepancy or if
there are additional configurations or steps I may have missed?
Looking forward to your insights and support.
Best regards,
Ilma masroor
