Awesome, I've captured your test error and filed a JIRA issue for 0.8, thanks Sean! I've also captured your issue about updating the description of Agility:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-747 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-748 Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: <ke...@apache.org> Reply-To: <user@oodt.apache.org> Date: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:09 AM To: <user@oodt.apache.org> Cc: <d...@oodt.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.7 release candidate #1 >Java 7 is A-O-K. No problems there. > >If we release with that caveat, then I'm +1. > >--k > > >On 2014-09-15, at 1:01 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hey Sean, >> >> Weird on the test - can you try with Java7? I ran and built >> with Java7 and am not sure the tests pass with Java8? >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: <ke...@apache.org> >> Reply-To: <user@oodt.apache.org> >> Date: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:00 AM >> To: <d...@oodt.apache.org> >> Cc: <user@oodt.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.7 release candidate #1 >> >>> Apache OODT 0.7 RC 1: >>> >>> Signature: confirmed >>> SHA1: matches >>> MD5: matches >>> Python tests: pass >>> Java tests: intermittent failures >>> Also, let's change oodt/agility/setup.py's description to "Apache >>>OODT". >>> >>> The failure seems to be an ordering issue: >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>-- >>> ----- >>> Test set: org.apache.oodt.cas.resource.queuerepo.TestXmlQueueRepository >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>-- >>> ----- >>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.249 >>>sec >>> <<< FAILURE! >>> >>>testMapping(org.apache.oodt.cas.resource.queuerepo.TestXmlQueueRepositor >>>y) >>> Time elapsed: 0.224 sec <<< FAILURE! >>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<[test-queue-1, quick]> >>> but was:<[quick, test-queue-1]> >>> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) >>> at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:280) >>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64) >>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:71) >>> at >>> >>>org.apache.oodt.cas.resource.queuerepo.TestXmlQueueRepository.testMappin >>>g( >>> TestXmlQueueRepository.java:64) >>> >>> Probably a quick fix. This is with Java 1.8.0_05. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2014-09-15, at 8:50 AM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Folks, >>>> >>>> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 0.7 release. >>>> The >>>> source code is at: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ >>>> >>>> For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for >>>> details on >>>> release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the >>>>OODT >>>> release process, documented on the Wiki here: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process >>>> >>>> The release was made from the OODT 0.7 tag (r1624941) at: >>>> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.7/ >>>> >>>> >>>> A staged Maven repository is available at: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1000/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT <version>. The >>>> vote >>>> is >>>> open for the next 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check >>>>the >>>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote >>>> passes >>>> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT <version> >>>> >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> P.S. Here is my +1. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
