Thank you Paul, much appreciated. I will try this and let you know the result.

Bests,
Nam

On Aug 21, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Paul Chavez <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hi Nam,
> 
> I had the exact same issue a few weeks ago and asked this. Here is the 
> resoponse I got from Mona Chitnis:
> 
> ===
> What you are looking for here is
> "oozie.service.CoordMaterializeTriggerService.lookup.interval". Default value 
> = 300 sec or 5 min. This server-level setting governs how often the 
> materialization service is triggered to materialize the next set of actions.
> 
> This service frequency works in conjunction with another setting - 
> "oozie.service.CoordMaterializeTriggerService.materialization.window".
> Default value = 3600 sec or 1 hour. What this means is every 5 min, Oozie 
> will materialize actions falling in the next 1 hour window.
> 
> For your use case, if you wish to materialize actions a) faster than every
> 5 min and b) spanning beyond 1 hour window at a time, you should consider 
> changing these 2 values.
> ===
> 
> In my case, all I had to do was update the first value (...lookup.interval) 
> and set it to 60s.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> Paul Chavez
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nam Pham [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:53 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Job creation rate
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am new to this mailing list and would like to say hi to everybody.
> 
> I am using oozie 3.3.2-chd4.3.0 to import about a year of data to hive.
> Data are stored hourly, so the coordinator need to create about 8000 jobs to 
> import all the data.
> 
> The problem is that oozie coordinator is too slow in creating jobs. It only 
> creates about 300 jobs per day with my setup. I tried to increase the 
> concurrency parameter of the coordinator job but it does not help.
> 
> Is there a knob anywhere making the coordinator create jobs faster, 
> preferably multiple jobs at once since those can be executed in parallel ?
> 
> Ideas and suggestions are much appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Nam

Reply via email to