Thats an issue with 4.0.0. Why don't you try 4.0.1 instead?

-Shwetha

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Brett Randall <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Trying to build the release-4.0.0 tag from source from git, I get:
>
> $ mvn -U test
> ...
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache Oozie Main ................................. SUCCESS [5.640s]
> [INFO] Apache Oozie Client ............................... SUCCESS [3.696s]
> [INFO] Apache Oozie Hadoop 1.1.1.oozie-4.0.0 ............. SUCCESS [0.234s]
> [INFO] Apache Oozie Hadoop Distcp 1.1.1.oozie-4.0.0 ...... SUCCESS [0.116s]
> [INFO] Apache Oozie Hadoop 1.1.1.oozie-4.0.0 Test ........ SUCCESS [0.213s]
> [INFO] Apache Oozie Hadoop 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT.oozie-4.0.0 .... FAILURE [3.615s]
> [INFO] Apache Oozie Hadoop 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT.oozie-4.0.0 Test  SKIPPED
> ...
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 14.168s
> [INFO] Finished at: Mon Nov 10 14:07:58 EST 2014
> [INFO] Final Memory: 26M/963M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project oozie-hadoop: Could not
> resolve dependencies for project
> org.apache.oozie:oozie-hadoop:jar:2.2.0-SNAPSHOT.oozie-4.0.0: Could
> not find artifact org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-client:jar:2.2.0-SNAPSHOT
> in apache.snapshots.repo
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots) -> [Help 1]
>
> Visiting
> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-client/2.2.0-SNAPSHOT/
> shows that the artifacts are in fact missing.
>
> Questions:
>
> * Is this tag build repeatable - where can I get the snapshots from -
> can they be replaced, or should I bump these to release versions?
> * Is the release train and timing such that Oozie must be released
> with shapshot dependencies?  If so, should local versions of those
> snapshots be released, so that the build is repeatable?
>
> Thanks
> Brett
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others 
authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance 
on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your 
system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission 
of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its 
receipt.

Reply via email to