Woops...my bad. It was a typo. Got in a hurry. Thanks for fixing. Take care, Jeremy
On 10/4/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Jeremy Whitlock wrote: > > > Rajesh, > > I'm sorry. When you get an unstable release, it contains a > > different naming > > convention. The file in question is: > > > > OPENEJB_HOME/openejb-loader-1.0-20050929.war > > > > It's actually OPENEJB_HOME/lib/openejb-loader-1.0-20050929.jar > > But the jar in question is up on our maven repo, so if you update the > openejb version in your project.xml to be 1.0-20050929 rather than > 1.0-SNAPSHOT, it will work much better. > > In general having a dependency on openejb 1.0-SNAPSHOT is not such a > good idea, maven will update that jar without even asking and you may > find yourself with project that no longer builds. We publish > unstable builds as often as needed so people shouldn't need to do that. > > -David > -- Take care, Jeremy
