The OM version on demo was just updated Could you please recreate with "one" two" "three" and correspondent number of fingers in the end so I can compare sources and produced recording and maybe will find what is wrong
On 5 August 2014 22:30, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > it is from yesterday... 3.0.3-SNAPSHOT 1615493 4-August-2014 > > > Am 05.08.2014 um 16:53 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > > definitely red5 synchronization error > haven't seen this before :( > > is it latest build? > > > On 5 August 2014 19:30, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hallo together, >> >> I am going to test OM 3.0.3. >> >> I get the following error while enter a room... >> >> [WARN] [RTMPExecutor#DRSZB4JVU8LAR-1] >> org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPMinaConnection - Interrupted while waiting for >> write lock. State: connected >> java.lang.InterruptedException: null >> at >> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1325) >> ~[na:1.7.0_55] >> at java.util.concurrent.Semaphore.tryAcquire(Semaphore.java:414) >> ~[na:1.7.0_55] >> at >> org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPMinaConnection.write(RTMPMinaConnection.java:366) >> ~[red5-server.jar:na] >> at org.red5.server.net.rtmp.Channel.write(Channel.java:136) >> [red5-server.jar:na] >> at org.red5.server.net.rtmp.Channel.write(Channel.java:106) >> [red5-server.jar:na] >> at >> org.red5.server.net.rtmp.RTMPHandler.onCommand(RTMPHandler.java:485) >> [red5-server.jar:na] >> at >> org.red5.server.net.rtmp.BaseRTMPHandler.messageReceived(BaseRTMPHandler.java:89) >> [red5-server.jar:na] >> at >> org.red5.server.net.rtmp.ReceivedMessageTask.call(ReceivedMessageTask.java:55) >> [red5-server.jar:na] >> at >> org.red5.server.net.rtmp.ReceivedMessageTask.call(ReceivedMessageTask.java:11) >> [red5-server.jar:na] >> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) >> [na:1.7.0_55] >> at >> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) >> [na:1.7.0_55] >> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) >> [na:1.7.0_55] >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) >> [na:1.7.0_55] >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) >> [na:1.7.0_55] >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) [na:1.7.0_55] >> >> The 2nd time everything works fine... Any ideas? >> >> Greetings Peter >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
