Please avoid writing direct emails, user/dev list should be used for
communications


RTMP port is used for RTMP connection/traffic (the value is taken from
red5.properties)
RTMPT port from red5.properties is not used, RTMPT traffic goes through
port 5080 (or other HTTP port configured in red5.properties)

>>Is it a good way to check port open or close with www.canyouseeme.org.
<http://www.canyouseeme.org/>
not sure, never tried that

>>What would you advise as the next course of solution to implement?
not sure what you asking for :( please rephrase



On 26 August 2014 13:14, Susheel Jalali <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Dear Maxim,
>
> Thank you for your prompt reply.
>
> 1.  On my Win-8.1 laptop, all firewalls were turned off e.g. Win Defender
> is OFF and AVG firewall is not even installed, since we have the FVS336G
> firewall. I believe just having anti-virus function of AVG should not cause
> an issue.
>
> 2.  Should I turn off Web filtering control (was tried, but not for all
> values of Port#.)
>
> 3.  Apart from this, we have configured the Netgear FVS336G router every
> time for port forwarding. In fact, even spent 3 hours on phone with Netgear
> Tech support to ensure the configuration was right.
>
> 4.  When this router is bypassed (direct laptop to our 2Mbps leased line
> over static IP), remote user is able to login to OM3.0 and enter the room
> fine.
>
> 5.  In seeking your help to understand your statement, do you mean to say
> 8088 is not used in 3.x at all and this communication is using 5080 or 80
> for RTMP traffic as well (irrespective of value given to rtmp.port in
> red5.properties)?  Please correct my understanding as you see it.
>
> 6.  Is it a good way to check port open or close with www.canyouseeme.org.
> <http://www.canyouseeme.org>
>      After starting Red5 server and host entering the chosen room, this
> site always shows 5080 and 1935 as SUCCESS/green, while 8088 or any other
> port# configured for RTMPT shows up as FAILED/red.
>
> 7.  What would you advise as the next course of solution to implement?
>
>
> Thank you for your kind help.
>
>   Regards,
>
> Susheel Jalali
>
> Customer Operations Leader,
>
> Coscend Communications Solutions
>
> Elite Premio Complex Suite 200 Survey No 7 & 8 Balewadi Pune 411045
> Maharashtra India
>
> Cell +91-9011000233
>
> *[email protected]
> <[email protected]>*
>
> Web site: www.CoscendCommunications.com
> <http://www.coscendcommunications.com/>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Coscend’s* *Software Service Factory*
>
> "*Coscend Communications* is ... *pioneering a new approach* to ...
> software applications development, and systems integration."
>
> *Light Reading Network, *December, 2007
>
> "*Coscend* is at the *vanguard of a new evolution* in telco OSS/BSS
> systems integration."
>
> *Caroline Chappell*
> A leading authority in the communications services software industry
>
> "There are *innovative* … *tools* from ... *Coscend *bubbling up, which
> will help accelerate the data consolidation process and reduce its cost."
>
> *Dennis Mendyk, **Editor,* Building a *Telco Service Factory*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail
> Messages from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
> http://www.CoscendCommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
> <http://www.coscendcommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html>
>
>
>  On 08/26/14 08:06, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> Hello Susheel,
>
>  1) RTMPT port is the same as HTTP since 3.0.x (don't remember the exact
> version)
> So you need to check you have 5080 in your config.xml
>
>  2) it seems to be network configuration issue, most probably you have
> multiple firewalls, please try to connect to the port 1935 using telnet to
> check it is accessible
>
>  3) you can change the code to try 1935 3 times, but I doubt it will
> help, I believe you need to configure network before modifying the code
>
>
> On 26 August 2014 06:05, Susheel Jalali <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Dear Maxim,
>>
>> We read many of your attentive solutions to issues people had with OM
>> over various versions.
>>
>> We are an early stage startup, and are interested in using the
>> OpenMeetings product.
>>
>> We have setup Port forwarding for all the three ports in firewall router
>> (5080, 1935, 8088 or its alternative values we used).
>>
>> We are not able to find a solution to following issues, for which we
>> appreciate any help you can provide:
>>
>> a)  RTMPT Port is not getting opened or served, no matter which Port# we
>> setup for it  in *red5.properties* (tried with 443, 1111, 8088, 5588,
>> 55588 and few others).
>>
>> b) After starting a conference from local machine, another user over LAN
>> is able to ENTER the meeting room assigned to his usergroup, but same user
>> if coming over WAN, is not able to enter. If 1935 is open in both cases,
>> why is he not able to enter?
>>
>> c) Port1935 is not responding over WAN, and the software tries it only
>> once followed by trying RTMPT port (8088) 3 times.  Where can we change the
>> code or configuration to make it try 3 times on 1935 port itself, before
>> trying RTMPT ?  And to try 1935 port with a larger timeout value for
>> WAN-router delay, what should be changed?
>>
>> We have checked using URL: www.canyouseeme.org  for ports being open and
>> served.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>  --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Susheel Jalali
>>
>> Customer Operations Leader,
>>
>> Coscend Communications Solutions
>>
>> Elite Premio Complex Suite 200 Survey No 7 & 8 Balewadi Pune 411045
>> Maharashtra India
>>
>> Cell +91-9011000233
>>
>> *[email protected]
>> <[email protected]>*
>>
>> Web site: www.CoscendCommunications.com
>> <http://www.coscendcommunications.com/>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *Coscend’s* *Software Service Factory*
>>
>> "*Coscend Communications* is ... *pioneering a new approach* to ...
>> software applications development, and systems integration."
>>
>> *Light Reading Network, *December, 2007
>>
>> "*Coscend* is at the *vanguard of a new evolution* in telco OSS/BSS
>> systems integration."
>>
>> *Caroline Chappell*
>> A leading authority in the communications services software industry
>>
>> "There are *innovative* … *tools* from ... *Coscend *bubbling up, which
>> will help accelerate the data consolidation process and reduce its cost."
>>
>> *Dennis Mendyk, **Editor,* Building a *Telco Service Factory*
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail
>> Messages from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
>> http://www.CoscendCommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
>> <http://www.coscendcommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to