You can take ..... (sorry for the typo) On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yo can take build #99+ from here > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.0.x/ > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Linas Redeckis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> i looked at Jira, and have no idea where to start. how to get latest >> build of Openmeetings? >> >> 2015-01-16 18:27 GMT+02:00 Linas Redeckis <[email protected]>: >> >>> will try later, and report the outcome. >>> >>> thank you >>> >>> 2015-01-15 20:29 GMT+02:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Should be addressed >>>> please check latest build >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot Linas! >>>>> will try to take care of it :) >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Linas Redeckis <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> thanks for suggestion. >>>>>> i just did filed JIRA thing (not sure what half of those fields ask >>>>>> me - my first issue). >>>>>> >>>>>> now I'm thinking, maybe there are users, that would be hurt by this >>>>>> change. is there a way to rename recording title? that way, if someone is >>>>>> not satisfied by change in default name format, then they could name it >>>>>> them self. >>>>>> renaming is kind of needed anyway. we use OM with Moodle + plugin. >>>>>> and creating content in system requires to select recording from dropdown >>>>>> list. and now it just "Recording *****" list with dates. but that is a >>>>>> different problem i think. plug-in could just return only current users >>>>>> recordings. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-12-22 8:17 GMT+02:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Linas, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is the "historical" behavior, and I also think it is a bug >>>>>>> Could you please file JIRA issue and I'll try to address it. Would >>>>>>> appreciate if you can describe the desired behavior. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the simplest would be: >>>>>>> 1) change the format in the name (will not affect old recordings) >>>>>>> 2) add "ORDER BY creationDate" >>>>>>> 3) implement both above >>>>>>> 4) something else >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Linas Redeckis <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is it only me, who noticed this? >>>>>>>> In "Recordings" page the list of entries are named "Recording >>>>>>>> USA_format_date_time". this naming style is badly ordered, because >>>>>>>> first >>>>>>>> enties are the ones done on every month first day, then goes entries >>>>>>>> of all >>>>>>>> months second day and so on.. >>>>>>>> ex.: >>>>>>>> Recording 1.10.2014 09:30 >>>>>>>> Recording 4.06.2013 09:30 <-- should be first or last >>>>>>>> Recoridng 5.10.2014 09.30 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is it bug, or configurable thing? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
