you can "sponsor" it using our commercial support This is the only way you can speed up things :(((((
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Susheel Jalali < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Maxim, > > It will be really useful for our employees and partners as well. > > Is there anything we could provide to help you release this "Webinar Room" > feature in 3.0.7 ? > > -- > > Regards, > > Susheel Jalali > > Coscend Communications Solutions > > * [email protected] > <[email protected]>* > > Web site: www.CoscendCommunications.com > <http://www.coscendcommunications.com/> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail > Messages from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at: > http://www.CoscendCommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html > <http://www.coscendcommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html> > > > Subject: > Re: "webinar" room > From: > [email protected] > Date: > 06/30/15 23:26 > To: > [email protected] > > OK - I see the build-on-demand.... > > I know of course **everything** is important. > > For me openmeetings now is a "nice toy" and it works stable and good > but I cannot use it for my purposes because I have only scenario: > > - one or two "teachers" share video and audio to a big audience > - the audience can share their audio if they have questions, remarks and so on > - teacher and the others recognize this and can react > > If teacher can manually give one or some people of the audience permission > to share their video, too this will be VERY VERY useful - but not absolutely > neccessary for using openmeetings (for me). > > I have checked out alternatives but I want to wait and use OM because its > philosophy and software realization is the way I like it > > Many thanks > Andreas > > Am Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015, 23:22:34 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > > This mean that will try to address this in the next minor release but not > 100% sure > You can get builds > herehttps://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.0.x/ > it is not nightly, but on-demand > > > user_12137.eml > Subject: > Re: "webinar" room > From: > Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Date: > 06/30/15 23:29 > To: > Openmeetings user-list <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > > I can set to be build on nightly basis, but currently see no need for > this, if any user asks for the build I can push the button, otherwise we > build it for internal testing :) > > We will try to address this issue, the delay was caused by our 3.1.0 > branch, we were planned to speed up 3.1.0 development, but unfortunately it > is not the case :( > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:56 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK - I see the build-on-demand.... >> >> I know of course *everything* is important. >> >> For me openmeetings now is a "nice toy" and it works stable and good >> but I cannot use it for my purposes because I have only scenario: >> >> - one or two "teachers" share video and audio to a big audience >> - the audience can share their audio if they have questions, remarks and >> so on >> - teacher and the others recognize this and can react >> >> If teacher can manually give one or some people of the audience permission >> to share their video, too this will be VERY VERY useful - but not >> absolutely >> neccessary for using openmeetings (for me). >> >> I have checked out alternatives but I want to wait and use OM because its >> philosophy and software realization is the way I like it :) >> >> Many thanks >> Andreas >> >> Am Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015, 23:22:34 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >> > This mean that will try to address this in the next minor release but >> not >> > 100% sure :( >> > You can get builds here >> > >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.0.x/ >> > it is not nightly, but on-demand >> >> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
