so only 2 rooms was occupied on server and both of them was served on one server?
same usecase but without moodle works as expected? On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Alessio Falsetti <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > 1) I have installed OpenMeetings, Moodle and the plug-in > 2) I have configured the cluster for OpenMeetings (it works) > 3) I have created a course in Moodle and add the new activity of OM at a > certain date > 4) I have created another activity of OM in other date, same course > 5) 2 users are connected to the first activity (room 1) > 6) 2 other users are connected to the second activity (room 2) > > All users are re-directed to the master server. > > Please let me know! Thank you! > > > 2015-07-29 19:10 GMT+02:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: > >> Actually the rooms are created in the DB >> Server selection mechanism is "in charge" only on room entering >> >> could you please provide repo-steps so I can try your scenario? >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Alessio Falsetti < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Maxim! >>> >>> With this version of OpenMeetings, the clustering works as expected! >>> Thank you!! :) >>> >>> But there is still an issue with Moodle plug-in. If the user access via >>> Moodle plug-in, all the rooms will be created only on master server. The >>> plug-in use "addRoomWithModerationAndExternalType" REST API for create a >>> room. >>> Maybe this function does not work/support the room distribution >>> mechanism? >>> >>> Thank you again and please let me know! >>> >>> Alessio >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 07/07/2015 at 19:37 you worte: >>> >>> Should be fixed >>> please try build #146 from here [1] >>> please write any issues/comments to the issue [2] >>> >>> [1] >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.0.x/ >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1230 >>> >>> Thanks for the reporting! >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Alessio Falsetti < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Maxim, >>>> >>>> ok thank you! Please let me know if you find something! >>>> >>>> Alessio >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/07/2015 at 07:43 you wrote: >>>> >>>> It seems like I was able to reproduce something :( >>>> Will try to investigate and address this >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Alessio, >>>>> >>>>> sorry for keeping silence (busy with my day-time job and other duties >>>>> :((( ) >>>>> I'll try to configure cluster of 2 servers locally and reproduce your >>>>> issue (I'll try to do it this week, please ping me in case I'll be too >>>>> silent :))) >>>>> >>>>> I see no issues with your config, so i'll try to reproduce the issue >>>>> first >>>>> There are no additional steps, I'm using same instruction :((( >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Alessio Falsetti < >>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>> >>>>>> any other suggestions regarding this problem with the clustering? There >>>>>> is some other undocumented parameter with which to experiment? >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let me know. Thanks in advance! >>>>>> >>>>>> Alessio >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 30/06/2015 at 16:39 you wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have servers enabled in admin? >>>>>> Do you have there ids specified in >>>>>> openmeetings-applicationContext.xml? >>>>>> Is there anything in the logs? >>>>>> What is displayed in Admin->Connections? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Alessio Falsetti < >>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we have configured OpenMeetings in cluster as described in >>>>>>> <http://openmeetings.apache.org/Clustering.html> >>>>>>> http://openmeetings.apache.org/Clustering.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but there is a problem with the users distribution on the slave >>>>>>> servers. >>>>>>> We have OpenMeetings version 3.0.5 whit this configuration: 1 Master >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> 2 slaves, but all users are redirected only to first slave server, >>>>>>> even >>>>>>> if users are in different rooms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's wrong? Any suggestions? Please help! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alessio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> WBR >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alessio >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
