Hi, Maxim, Thank you very much for your reply. I was testing using OM3.3. I set up a server in California and I am located in Boston. The client is located in Beijing, China. I did a video call with the client. I can feel there is some delay. The client can connect to the server at 2 Mbps speed and I can connect to the server at 2 Mbps speed. I don't understand why the video call still has obvious delay while Skype does not have this problem (at least much shorter delay). I guess this is because OM is not using point-to-point direct connection while Skype is using point-to-point connection. Is there any way I can reduce the delay? I just installed OM4.0, but I have not tested it yet. Do you think OM4.0 is better than OM3.0 in terms of delay.
Thanks a lot! Tom On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Network testing tool measures the speed using Flash player, > So the speed displayed is the actual AV speed > > What version are you testing? > > PS please do not cross-post to multiple multiple lists > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Tom Luo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, all, >> >> I just set up a server for long distance video conference. >> The client can download files from the server at 2mbps. However, when the >> client uses the network testing of the OM, the speed is only .02mbps. Any >> one knows why? >> When we tested face-to-face video talk, I can feel there is some delay. >> Is that possible to tune up OM so that we can improve the speed of OM? >> Moreover, compared with other open source tools, how does OM perform in >> terms of speed? >> Is there any other open source tool better than OM? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tom >> >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
