OK, then the easiest solution would be: to zoom document in case it is smaller than WB Could you please file JIRA regarding this?
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe most of the moderators doesn't care about what kind of width we > are talking about... ;-) > > I think the question is, what will be expected from the majority, if > choosing one of the zoom options. And here I got the feedback, that zoom on > the document (or as you said object dependent) is expected. And former > whiteboard did that trick so at least here the people will realize this > "loss of quality". > > Greetings Peter > > > Am 07.12.2017 um 14:30 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >> >> I guess this is also some kind of "wording" issue >> >> I read "Page width" as WB width == browser page width >> You read it as document page with == browser page width >> >> "document fit" might be the option, but this will add complication to zoom >> logic >> >> In previous version WB size was sort of fluid, it re-calculated based >> on the object s on WB >> Also complicated and hard to maintain :( >> >> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I believe this is discussable. >>> >>> I would say, if I have a presentation/webinar I would have some documents >>> that I put on the wb and that should take the maximum space (for me and >>> any >>> of my students). And therefore are full fit and page width. And >>> afterwards I >>> would start to draw something on my slides. >>> >>> If all that doesn't make sense I would suggest "document fit" and >>> "document >>> width" zoom level. And a wish, uploading a document to an empty wb should >>> trigger "document fit". >>> >>> Greetings Peter >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> Imagine the following scenario >>> you have created diagram on the WB >>> with images, arrows, text etc. >>> >>> and this diagram took the whole width of the WB 1920 px ... >>> >>> Now you have uploaded document with page width of 500px >>> >>> Should I cut all your diagram and mage WB width == 500px? >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I agree this is no blocker. >>> >>> But I think "full fit" and "page width" as zoom level doesn't make sense >>> now. These should take the document as reference and not the the >>> whiteboard. >>> >>> "Page width" (my understanding) should zoom to maximize the document >>> horizontally and "full fit" either vertically or horizontally. And this >>> is >>> not the behaviour right now (flash whiteboard it was in that way...). >>> >>> Greetings Peter >>> >>> >>> Am 07.12.2017 um 09:27 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>> Hello Peter, >>> >>> I'm not sure this the "issue" :)) >>> >>> 1) We have to create WB of some predefined size. (this size is hardcoded >>> to >>> be WxH 1920x1080) >>> 2) in case document dimensions are bigger WB size will be increased >>> 3) in case document dimensions are smaller it will occupy less space >>> >>> So I'm not sure how this should be addressed :( >>> We can create separate thread and discuss possible solution .... >>> >>> I believe this not blocker >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Maxim, >>> >>> unfortunately I haven't check this one before. :-( >>> >>> " >>> ... but the document on the whiteboard has a huge empty part on the right >>> side. And then zoom full page etc. doesn't show the expected result. >>> " >>> >>> But it still seems to be present. I'm not sure if this have to be fixed >>> before release. For me it would be fine after the release, because one >>> could >>> handle it by manually zoom. >>> >>> Greetings Peter >>> -- >>> B.Sc. Peter Dähn >>> Virtueller Campus Rheinland-Pfalz >>> Postfach 3049 >>> 67653 Kaiserslautern >>> Tel: 0631/205-4944 >>> Olat >> >> >> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
