It seems I wasn't clear enough :( Client side recording have some "cons": 1) The recording will be lost in case of any issue on client machine 1.1) or in case of the network error 2) Every client in the room already send his/her stream to the server, so it seems to be overkill to additionally send the recording (can be extremely huge) *) Server already processes every frame of video/audio, so I see no need to record same data on the client I see no "pros" in such solution **) you still can record on your client then upload video to the room
Regarding auto-recording: It is absolutely impossible to auto-start screen-sharing on client Same way it is impossible to auto start camera of microphone Over-wise it would be huge security hole ..... This is why I see no way to "auto start recording" Camera streams can easily be auto-recorded on the server, the question is: then what? Right now we taking video from the sharing, audio from camera streams and create "room recording". On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 09:09, Daniel Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > > > 1 it seems there is an option to load to server. > > 2 we believe it makes sense to be able to record in any room. > Especially conferencing rooms. We want to record cams and the > whiteboard interactions. > > > The reason for automating this is to allow the moderator to get on > with their presentation without having to remember to click record. > > > Thanks, > > > Dan > On 2/3/2019 10:04 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > Hello Daniel, > > Lets try to make things clean: > 1) The example you are referencing to uses "client side recording" > i.e. it records to the memory of client browser. > Om uses server side recording: recording performed and stored on the > server > 2) Auto-recording can be implemented in any version of OM > BUT it make sense for interview room only :( > > Interview room has no whiteboard, so all we need to record: camera streams > of the participants > Other room type do have whiteboard and the only video being used is the > video of shared screen > (other streams are being used for audio only) > > The process of starting screen-sharing can't be automated (in any version) > It is easier in 5.0 since java web start application is no more required > but it is still manual process ... > > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 at 08:25, Daniel Baker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This seems to work well : >> >> https://github.com/muaz-khan/RecordRTC >> >> >> >> >> On 2/3/2019 7:01 AM, Daniel Baker wrote: >> >> Maybe not the time to mention this but for OM5 can we automate >> the process of performing a recording. Maybe an admin setting - >> record session on entering room. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Dan >> >> >> > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> > Virus-free. > www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link> > <#m_37099893644456559_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
