Is this also 4.0.10?
(It looks more like Tomcat issue, or maybe not enough memory on server ....)

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 01:55, Rodolfo Gonzalez <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I found more. Users reported that they could not connect, and in fact I
> couldn't either. This was in the logs:
>
> ERROR 03-30 12:23:13.623 o.a.w.p.w.j.WicketEndpoint:86 [.0-5453-exec-16] -
> An error occurred in web socket connection with id : 5b0
> java.io.EOFException: null
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$NioSocketWrapper.fillReadBuffer(NioEndpoint.java:1179)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$NioSocketWrapper.fillReadBuffer(NioEndpoint.java:1150)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$NioSocketWrapper.read(NioEndpoint.java:1120)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFrameServer.onDataAvailable(WsFrameServer.java:72)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFrameServer.doOnDataAvailable(WsFrameServer.java:171)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFrameServer.notifyDataAvailable(WsFrameServer.java:151)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsHttpUpgradeHandler.upgradeDispatch(WsHttpUpgradeHandler.java:148)
>         at
> org.apache.coyote.http11.upgrade.UpgradeProcessorInternal.dispatch(UpgradeProcessorInternal.java:54)
>         at
> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:53)
>         at
> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:764)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1388)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
>         at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>         at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>         at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>
>
>
>> --
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to