Can I just replace the contents of /opt/open500 with those from apache-
openmeetings-5.1.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz and restart or is there anything
else I need to do?Dennis

On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 16:55 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> OK,
> please test build #115+ from here 
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetings/job/openmeetings/
> 
> I would like to confirm if audio/video streams in the room are more
> stable :)
> 
> Please NOTE configuration has been changed
> most valuable configurable parameters are now
> in ./webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/classes/openmeetings.properties :)
> 
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 13:50, Denis Noctor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi there Maxim,
> > 
> > I know you've mentioned that you are working on a few alternatives
> > since this email but I thought it best to get back in touch.
> > 
> > As you will see from the attached screenshot, I mustered up a few
> > computers (equally spread over 2 wifi networks in my home... in
> > different parts to reduce sound feedback etc. as I do not have
> > enough headsets). A few points to take into consideration... some
> > of these computers are older than others... varying in RAM and
> > CPU... but ALL were using the latest version of Chrome. This is
> > what I noticed:
> > 
> > While you can see from the screenshot, there are 7 users in a room
> > (6 of which using 120x90 screen res and 1 using 320x240 - audio and
> > vid channels open)... there had been some issues. I let the room
> > open for about 40 mins but some video pods "dropped" from some
> > computers... with no indication as to whether users were still
> > active or not. Sometimes I had to "reconnect" video and audio on
> > others. Some computers showed all 7 connections... while others
> > showed 3... but  AFTER I added an 8th user (via an Amazon Fire
> > tablet) "Video / Audio" pods began to drop from a lot of the
> > computers... showing only 3-4 videos pods... and disconnecting
> > users... and sometimes being unable to reconnect... or refresh
> > their screen (on one computer... Chrome became unresponsive).
> > 
> > When I added the "8th user" to the group... sound quality
> > dropped... with a very "scratchy" interference noise for all users.
> > 
> > Things were much more stable with 5 users in a room.
> > 
> > Of course, as you can imagine... this is a "one room" scenario.
> > 
> > While I have mentioned that I was using older to newer computers
> > and tablets (based on what is available to me)... all of them were
> > able to perform okay in Microsoft Teams and Zoom scenarios
> > (tested)... but obviously with varying degrees of performance due
> > to speed, cpu, ram etc.
> > 
> > This seems to be a major issue and I am happy to test everything
> > out on the OM demo sites and give feedback over the next few days
> > if you would like. My next question would be... if that you had 2
> > similar rooms / classes open under the same circumstances... would
> > the overall performance be even worse?
> > 
> > I have tested this on a single AWS server, Ubuntu 18.04, 8 gigs ram
> > server etc (OM 5 M4... yes, I know, I know... will upgrade soon...
> > but assume this issue has crossed over to other versions -  I will
> > retest on the OM demos online.)
> > 
> > Hope some of this feedback helps.  
> > 
> > 
> >     
> >         
> >             Virus-free. www.avg.com
> >             
> >     
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:08 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hello Denis,
> > > please let me know if 10 users in the room will be OK
> > > we need to change the way cluster works in case current
> > > configuration is not stable/powerful enough
> > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 13:33, Denis Noctor <[email protected]
> > > > wrote:
> > > > Actually... this is something that had crossed my mind
> > > > recently. Previously, I’ve had on average 5 users per group...
> > > > but on occasion if there more than 5 users (in and around 7-10) 
> > > > some users... some would intentionally drop drop their cam...
> > > > and sometimes mic... (I thought it might have been due to
> > > > bandwidth issues on their side)... but I’ve got my own kids
> > > > taking online classes via their schools... whereby there are a
> > > > min of 20 attending a class and so on (different platforms
> > > > etc.)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I have about a combination of 5 to 6 computers at home due to
> > > > home office / covid restrictions etc. and am happy to log in to
> > > > either the OM demo sites or others to try replicate this
> > > > scenario. (and my own, of course).
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yep, I’ve been reading up on WebRTC and Kurento regarding
> > > > connectivity limitations regarding audio and video... this has
> > > > been covered a lot recently in previous posts in this forum...
> > > > and from memory it is somewhere between 200-300 connections...
> > > > (per server? / instance?)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > For example... if you have 5 users in a room (using audio and
> > > > video) this will result in 5 (users) x 5 audio connections x 5
> > > > video connections... giving “125” connections... but if you
> > > > have 7 users in a room receiving and experiencing audio and
> > > > vid... that is 7x7x7= 343 connections... which obviously
> > > > exceeds the connections as per previous posts.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I have had a scenario whereby 3 classes were held at the same
> > > > time on the same AWS instance... and nobody has reported a
> > > > problem (yet... or they unknowingly downplayed it due to
> > > > internet bandwidth problems etc.)... but the max number of
> > > > students per room has been 4-5....
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I am happy to test this more with others, if you are up for it
> > > > and am watching this carefully.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I have a scheduled meeting with 10 participants next week and
> > > > am now nervous... and curious to see how it works out.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Talk soon.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Denis
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > On Oct 21, 2020, at 7:57 PM, dww <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Does anyone have an idea why the client browser seems to
> > > > limited to 5
> > > > 
> > > > > video pods when each user connects with both video and
> > > > microphone.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > It seems to definitely max out the CPU(s) on the client
> > > > computer. How
> > > > 
> > > > > do other applications like Zoom or Microsoft Teams get around
> > > > this
> > > > 
> > > > > issue. Do they throttle back the streaming of the video pods
> > > > or views
> > > > 
> > > > > of many or most of the pods and do it in some kind of round-
> > > > robin
> > > > 
> > > > > update?
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Am I just doing something wrong.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Any response would be appreciated. I would like to start uses
> > > > OM for
> > > > 
> > > > > meetings next month.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > > Dennis
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >> On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 17:40 -0400, dww wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >> When creating 3 guests on each of 2 other laptops that I run
> > > > into the
> > > > 
> > > > >> same issues,so it seems that the main limitation is the
> > > > number of
> > > > 
> > > > >> video/audio pods within a client. Is there anyway to get
> > > > around that
> > > > 
> > > > >> as
> > > > 
> > > > >> it implies that one annot have more than 4 or 5 guests with
> > > > both
> > > > 
> > > > >> video
> > > > 
> > > > >> and audio?
> > > > 
> > > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > >> Dennis
> > > > 
> > > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>> On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 13:00 -0400, dww wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >>> Yes I get the same result, however, this does not appear to
> > > > be a
> > > > 
> > > > >>> valid
> > > > 
> > > > >>> stress test of kms. This stress tests a client machine with
> > > > 
> > > > >>> multiple
> > > > 
> > > > >>> tabs or browser windows each with connections and
> > > > determines that
> > > > 
> > > > >>> it
> > > > 
> > > > >>> is
> > > > 
> > > > >>> CPU bound.
> > > > 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>> It seems the only way to stress test kms is to do this with
> > > > 
> > > > >>> multiple
> > > > 
> > > > >>> client machines. I have 3 laptops here and a couple of
> > > > smart phones
> > > > 
> > > > >>> so
> > > > 
> > > > >>> I will try distributing the client windows among all of
> > > > them.
> > > > 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>> Dennis
> > > > 
> > > > >>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>> On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 10:56 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >>>> I'm on Ubuntu 20.04 desktop? so i can use UI
> > > > 
> > > > >>>> if you are using server I would recommend `htop`
> > > > 
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 10:54, dww <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> May I ask for your linux command line that got the CPU
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> percentage
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> for all cores?
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> Dennis
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 12:59 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> i just have tried the following script
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> started as `./run10.sh 5`
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> everything seems to work, but my CPU was 800% busy (all
> > > > cores
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> were 100% busy)
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> without `--use-fake-device-for-media-stream` parameter I
> > > > had
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> lots
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> of permission errors due to camera was "captured" by
> > > > first
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> browser
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> other have reported "Camera busy" error
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> _HASH_HERE_ - should be replaced with real hash (I have
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> created
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> endless invitation hash to the private conference room)
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> the script
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> ===============================================
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> #!/bin/bash
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> i=$1
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> if [ -z "${i}" ]; then
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>  i=30
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> fi
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> let "i += 0"
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> rm -rf /tmp/delme*
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> while ((i--)); do
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>  #echo "${i}"
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>  mkdir /tmp/delme${i}
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>  #local conference
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>  chromium-browser --user-data-dir=/tmp/delme${i} --
> > > > disable-
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> infobars --no-default-browser-check --allow-insecure-
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> localhost
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> use-fake-device-for-media-stream '
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > https://localhost:5443/openmeetings/hash?invitation=_HASH_HERE_&language=1'
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> &
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> done
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 09:10, dww <[email protected]>
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> I mentioned earlier that I wanted to experiment with
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> clustering
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> using
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> docker swarm for the kms service.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> I wanted to establish a base line using one container
> > > > for
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> kms. 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> All the
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> components are in one Linode with 8 GB of RAM.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> For this experiment. I start entering the video and
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> whiteboard
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> room
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> from my admin login from Firefox on one laptop. I
> > > > allowed
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> both
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> video
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> and microphone and the video pod was the lowest
> > > > resolution.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> I
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> generate
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> a  guest url to the room.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> On another laptop also on the same connection to the
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> internet
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> I
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> enter
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> the room on firefox and allow both video ( lowest
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> resolution)
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> and
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> microphone on a new tab each time.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> Up to 4 guest clients load quickly and the pods are
> > > > created
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> almost
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> immediately on all 5 tabs. On the first attempt on the
> > > > 5th
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> guest the
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> pod for this guest on the admin laptop took a couple of
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> minutes
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> to load
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> the video. On the 5th guest tab, the pods for guest 1,
> > > > 2
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> and
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 4
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> would
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> not refresh( pod frames present but no video.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> RAM and CPU usage was not significant on the server.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> I closed the tabs for all the guests and redid the
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> experiment,
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> The
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> first 4 guests again loaded quickly without any issues.
> > > > The
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 5th
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> guest
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> loaded to completion but took about 40 seconds for all
> > > > 6
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> tabs
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> to
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> complete. On the 6th guest there were multiple
> > > > connection
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> drops
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> and
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> retries and the tabs were reduced to about 3 pods
> > > > working,
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> the
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> others
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> gone, this was on all tabs.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> So based on this it seems that up to 5 users using both
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> video
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> and
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> microphone seem to work fine.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> Does this agree with anyone else's experience? I had
> > > > from
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> other
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> posts
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> that we can expect 14-15 users per kms instance. Does
> > > > both
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> laptop on
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> the same network have any influence on this?
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> I will try a swarm next after I gets some feedback.
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>>>>> 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Maxim
> > 
> > 
> >     
> >         
> >             Virus-free. www.avg.com
> >             
> >     
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to