yes On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 17:58, Alvaro <zurca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...will be 5.1.0 ? > > > > .................... > > > El lun, 30-11-2020 a las 15:15 +0700, Maxim Solodovnik escribió: > > Can I start the release process? > Can you see any show-stoppers? > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 21:28, kaffeesurrogat <kaffeesurro...@posteo.de> > wrote: > > this thread is a total mess now ;-( sorry sorry ..... > > On 20/11/2020 15:03, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > NP :) > > > > Actually what I meant by "were used for display purposes" is > > > > * userA streams his/her screen at FHD 1920x1080 (but specifies > > 300x900 at sharing dialog) > > > > as a result > > > > * userB receives FHD video 1920x1080, but displays it in a 300x300 > > window > > > > as a bonus 300x300 also being used while creating recording, and final > > video is super-ugly > > > > the window size of the screen sharing dialog effected both. The > resolution of the screen share display is although used when recording > the session on video ? > > that's it ? > > > as a workaround i can limit screen-sharing display pod by let's say > > 90% of viewport (visible browser area) > > would it be OK? > > > for me it would be nice ... but i'm not the only person using > openmeetings, thus i would like to ask others to say a word about this > ..... > > Right now, the dragable button to resize the screen-sharing display is > out of the monitor screen. You can hit minimize, then use the dragable > resize button and then unminize. > But that's something I need to explain to people on the receiving side, > and very often they don't get it .... > > > > many thanks Maxim, > > kaffeesurrogat > > > better solution would be to address OPENMEETINGS-2000 but i'm not sure > how > > would it be OK if all video pods will be displayed of constant size? > > (preserving aspect ratio? > > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 20:53, kaffeesurrogat <kaffeesurro...@posteo.de > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>> wrote: > > > > sorry maxim, send this message directly to you not to the list. > > need to > > learn how to use thunderbird > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] release current 5.1.0 as 5.0.2 > > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:48:39 +0100 > > From: kaffeesurrogat <kaffeesurro...@posteo.de > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>> > > Reply-To: kaffeesurro...@posteo.de > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de> > > To: Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com > > <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 20/11/2020 14:34, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 20:28, kaffeesurrogat > > <kaffeesurro...@posteo.de <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de> > > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>>> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Maxim, > > > > > > > > > On 20/11/2020 13:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 18:53, kaffeesurrogat > > > <kaffeesurro...@posteo.de <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de> > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>> > > > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de <mailto: > kaffeesurro...@posteo.de> > > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de > > <mailto:kaffeesurro...@posteo.de>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Everybody, > > > > > > > > is it a bug or a feature ? > > > > > > > > I'm running: > > > > > > > > > > > > Name > > > > OpenMeetings > > > > Version > > > > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT > > > > Revision > > > > b9b202a > > > > Build date > > > > 2020-11-18T09:35:56Z > > > > > > > > Previous versions offered to set the screen size before > > starting > > > > screen > > > > shares. This option is gone. I would love have it back ... > ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > these numbers did nothing :( > > > > > > are you shure ? I've tested it on > > > > > > Name > > > Meet,OpenMeetings > > > Version > > > 5.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT > > > Revision > > > c5c0381 > > > Build date > > > 2020-05-30T05:54:17Z > > > > > > > > > and the numbers in the screen sharer (attached screen_sharing.PNG) > > > dialog did a lot (attached 300t300.png and 1000t1000.png) > > > > > > I always choose the standard of 800x600. Never had complaints about > > > share not fitting on screen ( display, monitor ...) > > > > > > On the 5.1.0 snapshot the shared screen is almost always to big. > > Cause > > > of this the drag and drag button to resize the screen is not > > > displayed .... > > > > > > > > > sure, I'm sure :))) > > i guess your are, never really assumed anything else ;-) > > i'm getting nervous now ... > > > > > these numbers were used to "display" provided screen-share > > > and to convert it with crop while recording (if width/height > > ratio was > > > entered wrong) > > > > > > > but öööhhhmmmm, these numbers really scale the displayed screen of a > > shared programm window on the receiving side .... i swear an oath ;-) > > double checked .... > > > > > > have a look at the attached screenshots in the previous post ... > might > > not be obvious at the first glance, > > > > > what are you facing > > > is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2000 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2000> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2000 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2000>> (i guess) > > > > na no that's not the one .... > > > > > > > > > > > Have fun .... > > > > > > kaffeesurrogat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > they were required due to I was unable to find the way to get > > > the real > > > > size of screen-sharing > > > > Unfortunately user have almost no controls of screen-sharing > > quality > > > > > > > > > > > > Screen share from a client with a hig res monitor to a > > > client with > > > > lower > > > > res monitor give hughe screen on the low res monitor ..... > > > > > > > > Have fun, > > > > > > > > kaffeesurrogat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/11/2020 17:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > ATM we have 39 JIRA issues addressed > > > > > I would like to release 5.0.2 based on current > > > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT in a > > > > > week or so > > > > > > > > > > implementation of SIP is moving slow, so one-two > > intermediate > > > > releases > > > > > might be good idea > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Maxim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > Maxim > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, > > > Maxim > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Maxim > > > > > -- Best regards, Maxim
