No worries Arne, rolling a new take is not a big effort. I'm not sure though how we should treat the webbeans-cdi11 module. Imo it being only included in the source release but not in the build is an ok alternative. I can tweak this but I'd rather not contain it directly in the build.
LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Arne Limburg <[email protected]> >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>; openwebbeans-dev ><[email protected]> >Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 13:07 >Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 > > >Damn, this is a >-1 >for me, sorry > >Then we should fix the license issue, too. > >Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >Antworten an: >"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >Datum: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 16:16 >An: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, >openwebbeans-dev ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >Betreff: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 > >oops, missed: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/webbeans-cdi11/pom.xml > -> the parent is not correct > > >Romain Manni-Bucau >Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > >2013/5/8 Romain Manni-Bucau ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >+1 > >side note: seems we still include javassist licences >http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/licenses.html, >is it intended? > >Romain Manni-Bucau >Twitter: @rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > >2013/5/8 Jens Schumann ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >Even though I have no vote to offer I am at +1 since 1.2.0 improves a lot >around interceptors (for observer methods and even life cycle callbacks) if >applied during ProcessAnnotatedType. In 1.1.x I encountered strange situations >where it sometimes worked and sometimes not. From what I understood it was >related to the order classes where processed. > >So thanks for improving 1.2.0 internally a lot. > >Jens > > > >On 07.05.2013, at 23:53, "Mark Struberg" ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 . >> >> This is the first release of the OpenWebBeans-1.2.x branch. >> This release changed many internal mechanics but still targets >> the CDI-1.0 specification. >> >> Please note that the source binary containes a few non-enabled modules like >> webbeans-cdi11. They do pass RAT though. >> >> >> The ReleaseNotes are available online: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12315461 >> >> Maven staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/ >> >> SVN source tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.0/ >> >> Source Release: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.0/openwebbeans-1.2.0-source-release.zip >> >> Binary release: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-016/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.0/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.0-binary.zip >> >> PGP release key 2FDB81B1 >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS >> >> The VOTE will be open for 72 hours. >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 veto (and reason why) >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> > > > >
