Check the WAS v8.5.5 infocenter on how to configure session replication :

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v8r5/topic/com.ibm.websphere.nd.doc/ae/cprs_sess.html

And if you use EJBs, don't forget to active SFSB too.

Denis


2013/11/27 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>

> Hi
>
> We use WebSphere 8.5.5. Would be great to know what the out-of-the-box
> configuration is,  some details on how it works and also if I can/should do
> any cobfiguration changes.
>
> We also plan to use WebSpheres feature for storing session data in the DB
> (or is that the session replication you are mentioning or is there maybe
> different options available for configuring it).
>
> Regards
> LF
>
> On Nov 27, 2013 6:34 PM, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > First of all, WebSphere comes with session replication out of the box
> (at least in WAS enterprise).
> > I have WAS 8.0.0.6 running in a clustered environment with session
> replication without any issues (oki, there is one: delta-replication is not
> usable for all scenarios. But that's actually more a servlet spec issue).
> >
> > Which exact version of WAS do you use?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013, 18:18
> >> Subject: Re: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped
> >>
> >> Hi
> >> I was also thinking of how to enterpret that sentence...
> >> How can I verify or get more information on the actual WebSphere
> configuration when it comes to failover and so on?
> >> On Nov 27, 2013 6:06 PM, "Joseph Bergmark" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think a key piece on information on that page is this sentence
> "Properties that are not listed below, such as those that control the
> lifecycle and services, should remain at the default value for the
> application server."
> >>>
> >>> In other words you should not overwrite the FailOverService or
> ContextService that are integrated into the application server run time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Mark
> >>>>
> >>>> We run WebSphere 8.5, if I understand the WebSphere documentation the
> bundled OWB does use the default configuration for most of the parameters
> (except for the ones specified on
> http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v8r0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.websphere.nd.multiplatform.doc%2Finfo%2Fae%2Fae%2Frweb_cdi_customprops.html
> ).
> >>>>
> >>>> So the default implementation will move all context information to
> the HttpSession and let the container (WebSphere in our case) decide
> how/where to store the context?
> >>>>
> >>>> When using the FailOverService I assume you cannot hold the contexts
> in memory or? How does that work?
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there any other implementation of the ContextService or examples
> on how to modify/implement our own (most for learning I would assume....)
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Lars-Fredrik
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Lars!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Our storages can be changed easily. It depends on the
> ContextsService SPI implementation which is being used. By default in
> native OWB we hold all the contexts in memory for better performance. Of
> course we do observe session passivation and on willPassivate store the
> context over into the session.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you mean to create a clustered environment, then there is also an
> own FailOverService which you can activate by simply adding the
> openwebbeans-clustering module.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What is your exact operation environment? TomEE, Geronimo,
> WebSphere, Tomcat, Jetty, standalone, ...? OWB is already used in quite a
> few containers and this topic is also depending on the owb version + the
> integration scenario in the container.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>> strub
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> >________________________________
> >>>>> > From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>
> >>>>> >To: [email protected]
> >>>>> >Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 23:41
> >>>>> >Subject: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >Hi!
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >I assume that both @SesionScoped and @ConversationScoped beans
> store their data in the HttpSession? If not how is this handled?
> >>>>> >Is there any (preferred) way of changing where data is stored? E.g.
> under certain circumstances store data in a DB rather than in the
> HttpSession (to make it available to other containers).
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >Regards
> >>>>> >Lars-Fredrik
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >--
> >>>>> >Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> >>>>> >The information contained in this electronic message and any
> >>>>> >attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of
> the
> >>>>> >address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information.
> If
> >>>>> >you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik
> Smedberg
> >>>>> >immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this
> >>>>> >message and any attachments.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> >>>>
> >>>> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> >>>> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> >>>> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> >>>> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> >>>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik
> Smedberg
> >>>> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this
> >>>> message and any attachments.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to