It sounds like the Websphere documentation in this area isn't sufficient to answer your questions. It might be appropriate to open a PMR to get these details explained and perhaps added to the info center. On Nov 28, 2013 6:20 AM, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Mark > > Can you see if IBM did implement their own FailOverService or if they use > the DefaultOwbFailOverService? If they implemented their own is the > settings for failover and passivation (in openwebbeans.properties) still > valid? Do you know any of their implementation detail? > > Regads > Lars-Fredrik > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> I just know from my IBM key accounter that liberty does not provide >> enterprise management nor clustering. It's more targeted for sticky session >> spread out stuff. Joe might probably be able to help. >> >> (I personally most of the times combine sticky session with session >> replication via MSM, but that's another story). >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> > From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> >> >To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> >Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013, 22:53 >> >Subject: Re: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped >> > >> > >> > >> >Hi Mark >> > >> > >> >In development we are using WebSphere Liberty Profile 8.5.1. For >> production I need to check the version and get back to you with that.... >> > >> > >> >Do you have any suggestion on how I can verify the setup in the >> production WebSphere..? >> > >> > >> >Do you know what kind of setup the Liberty Profile comes with? >> > >> > >> >Regards >> >Lars-Fredrik >> > >> > >> > >> >On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> >> >>Well the point is that in WebSphere all those settings and modules >> should already be set up correctly. >> >>Of course this is if you use a WebSphere edition (enterprise) which >> supports clustering at all. Is this the case Lars-Fredrik? Or are you using >> e.g. the dev edition or even liberty-profile? >> >> >> >> >> >>We did all the SPI stuff for allowing container integrators and >> extension builders for going the most flexible route. And to allow to build >> a container yourself (e.g. by just taking tomcat + tweaking stuff yourself). >> >>Otoh if you use a Container like WebSphere or TomEE, then you usually >> don't need to tweak anything! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>LieGrue, >> >>strub >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>________________________________ >> >>> From: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> >> >>>To: [email protected] >> >>>Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013, 21:41 >> >> >> >>>Subject: Re: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>Since 1.2.0, you actually only need the clustering module + >> registering the FailOverFilter in the web.xml. >> >>> >> >>>Sorry but i don't know about WebSphere, you should ask the WebSphere >> developer. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>2013/11/27 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >>>@Thomas >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>So if I understand it correct, if I want to use the distributed >> session management in WebSphere I would need to configure the >> FailOverService and set issupportfailover to true ? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>Is that how it is configured in WebSphere out-of-the-box? If not how >> can I do that and how can I verify the setup? Is it logged at startup? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>Regards >> >>>>Lars-Fredrik >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Thomas Andraschko < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>We have 2 flags in OWB: issupportfailover and issupportpassivation >> >>>>> >> >>>>>issupportpassivation only stores the beans in the session on >> passivation. >> >>>>>issupportfailover stores the beans after each request. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>-- >> >>>>Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >> >>>> >> >>>>Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> >>>> >> >>>>STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >> >>>>The information contained in this electronic message and any >> >>>>attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >> >>>>address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >> >>>>you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik >> Smedberg >> >>>>immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >> >>>>message and any attachments. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >> > >> >Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> > >> >STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >> >The information contained in this electronic message and any >> >attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >> >address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >> >you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> >immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >> >message and any attachments. >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this > message and any attachments. >
