Yes we do that... the question was more on the reinject of transient fields... (the logger was brought up since I can see that there are alot of "example" of that out there)...
Regards LF On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not use splain tatic loggers as we do since many years? > > Good enough, rock stable and fast as hell ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, 10 December 2013, 11:42 > > *Subject:* Re: Reinject of transient dependencies? + Question on > @ConversationScoped > > We don't do that but I've seen alot of examples. > You mention that it is to slow in the end, what other patterns is good / > bad to use with respect to performance and CDI? Are there any articles > available on that topic? > Regards > Lars-Fredrik > On Dec 10, 2013 11:32 AM, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I generally question logger injection. It's just way too slow in the end > anyway > LieGrue, > strub > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Monday, 9 December 2013, 23:29 > *Subject:* Re: Reinject of transient dependencies? + Question on > @ConversationScoped > > Hi Mark > I was just wondering since some CDI examples (especially those that inject > a Logger that is not proxyable) suggest injecting it to a transient field > in a passivation scope bean.... I guess those examples are not right then? > Hi! > > Nope, we do not re-inject anything. > The parts which do not get serialized are lost. > > You could of course handle serialisation yourself and fill the injection > point with BeanManager#getReference manually. But what for? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> > >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >Sent: Monday, 9 December 2013, 13:49 > >Subject: Reinject of transient dependencies? + Question on > @ConversationScoped > > > > > > > >Hi! > > > > > >Some questions if anyone can help me out: > > > > > >1. In the case of passivation and activation will OWB reinject transient > dependencies or how are they treated? > >2. Is there any (easy) way to use @ConversationScoped in a none > JSF-environment or should I use something else (or perhaps create a custom > scope)? > > > > > > > >Regards > >Lars-Fredrik > > > >-- > >Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > > >Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > > >STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > >The information contained in this electronic message and any > >attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > >address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > >you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > >immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this > >message and any attachments. > > > > > > > > > -- Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards Lars-Fredrik Smedberg STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
