yes (for all)

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-12-29 18:15 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>:
> Hi Romain
>
> So @Dependent as the default scope for the producer does that mean that a
> seperate instance of the producer class (the class containing the non-static
> @Producer method) will be create for each produced value?
>
> If I for example annotate the producer class @ApplicationScoped and let it
> contain a @Produces method without a scope annotation the produced value
> will still be @Dependent right?
>
> Regards
> LF
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> default scope is @Dependent producer and produced value.
>>
>> Does it affects? depends. basically the produced value will be
>> produced using the contextual producer instance this means if you have
>> some state the produced value depends on then it will change the
>> produced value otherwise it will not change anything excepted it will
>> create one producer instance by "produce" invocation.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-29 16:25 GMT+01:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Might have touched this question before but in that case I cannot find
>> > the
>> > answer.
>> >
>> > I'm wondering what the scope of a class containing non-static @Produces
>> > methods are if not explicitly specified? @RequestScoped?
>> > Does the scope of the class containing the @Produces method in any way
>> > affect the scope of the bean being produced?
>> >
>> > Any references to the CDI spec would be great to
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Lars-Fredrik
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>> >
>> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> >
>> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
>> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>> > immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this
>> > message and any attachments.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>
> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.

Reply via email to