James, Pherf looks interesting. I will check it out further. As I understand the issue, it is specific to HDP. I have opened a support ticket and they are working on a resolution. I agree - the later the Phoenix version the better!
Thanks, Ralph On 4/13/15, 11:49 PM, "James Taylor" <[email protected]> wrote: >Any improvement on the situation with your cluster, Ralph? > >I don't have a specific recommendation for you specific to HBase >0.98.4. In general, Phoenix improves with each release, so the later >the better IMHO. The same would likely be said in the HBase community. >I can share the combinations of versions and features we use at >Salesforce (we're not currently using local indexes), and perhaps >other users can do the same for configurations they're using. > >FWIW, we don't test each combination of HBase with each combination of >Phoenix - that wouldn't be feasible given our limited resources. We >have recently open sourced a very nice framework called Pherf[1] which >you can use to do performance and functional verification at scale. >The hope is that others in the community use this tool and share >results so we all learn better what works well and what needs to be >improved. > >Thanks, >James > >[1] http://phoenix.apache.org/pherf.html > >On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Perko, Ralph J <[email protected]> >wrote: >> Hi, What is the recommended Phoenix version for HBase 0.98.4? Should I >> downgrade to 4.2.2? >> >> Thanks, >> Ralph >> >>
