Let me know when you have setup the repo; I am aware of the code changes to make for CDH compatibility. stack overflow also has details.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:08 PM, James Heather <james.heat...@mendeley.com> wrote: > Thanks! I'll set up a repo today, and we can see how far we get with it. > > Another recent thread points to a stack overflow answer with some clues. > On 10 Sep 2015 7:00 am, "Krishna" <research...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I can volunteer to spend some time on this. >> >> CDH artifacts are available in Maven repo but from reading other threads >> on CDH-Phoenix compatibilty, it looks like there are some code changes to >> be made in Phoenix to successfully compile against CDH. >> >> Here are questions to address: >> 1) How to maintain CDH compatible Phoenix code base? >> 2) Is having a CDH compatible branch even an option? >> >> Krishna >> >> >> >> On Friday, August 28, 2015, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes I am interested. Assuming CDH artifacts are publicly available in a >>> Maven repo somewhere, which I believe is the case, perhaps we (the Phoenix >>> project/community) could set up a Jenkins job that builds against them and >>> makes the resulting build artifacts available. They would never be an >>> official release, just a best effort convenience. Would that work? I think >>> little must be done besides compile against the CDH artifacts for binary >>> compatibility. >>> >>> >>> > On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:19 AM, James Heather < >>> james.heat...@mendeley.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Is anyone interested in helping with getting an up-to-date >>> CDH5-compatible build of Phoenix up and running? >>> > >>> > Cloudera has a build of Phoenix 4.3 ( >>> https://github.com/cloudera-labs/phoenix), but this is now two versions >>> behind, and there seems little desire at Cloudera to keep it updated. >>> > >>> > I imagine that by looking at the differences between vanilla 4.3 and >>> cloudera labs 4.3, and with some guidance from this list, we could get a >>> good idea of what would need to be modified in 4.5+ and keep a >>> CDH5-compatible build up to date. >>> > >>> > Yes? >>> > >>> > James >>> >>
