Thanks Sergey.

Let me check this

Regards
Sanooj

On 22 Oct 2016 1:55 a.m., "Sergey Soldatov" <sergeysolda...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Sanooj,
>
> You may take a look at BaseResulterators.getIterators() and
> BaseResultIterators.getParallelScans()
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Sanooj Padmakumar <p.san...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> If anyone can provide some information as to which part of the phoenix
>> code we need to check to see how parallel execution is performed.
>>
>> Thanks again
>> Sanooj
>>
>> On 20 Oct 2016 11:31 a.m., "Sanooj Padmakumar" <p.san...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> We are loading data from Phoenix tables into in-memory database. Based
>>> on the query we are finding the number of phoenix input splits (similar to
>>> what happens inside phoenix MR) and loads the data into in-memory database
>>> in parallel. So we are looking for ways to further parallelize the scan of
>>> a larger region.
>>>
>>> As you mentioned phoenix does this for all its queries. Can you please
>>> provide pointers to the phoenix code where this happens ?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the prompt response.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sanooj Padmakumar
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:22 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sanooj,
>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by "loading data in our HBase table into
>>>> in-memory", but Phoenix queries tables in parallel, even within a region
>>>> depending on how you've configured statistics and guideposts as described
>>>> here: http://phoenix.apache.org/update_statistics.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, October 19, 2016, Sanooj Padmakumar <p.san...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We are are loading data in our HBase table into in-memory. For this
>>>>> we provide a start row and end row and scan the hbase regions. Is there a
>>>>> way we can scan a big region in parallel to fasten this whole process ? 
>>>>> Any
>>>>> help/pointers on this will be of great help.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Sanooj Padmakumar
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sanooj Padmakumar
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to