Any advices? Helps? I can reproduce problem and capture more logs if needed.
> On 21 Sep 2018, at 02:13, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks like lock goes away 30 minutes after index region split. > So i can assume that this issue comes from cache that configured by this > option: phoenix.coprocessor.maxMetaDataCacheTimeToLiveMs > > > >> On 21 Sep 2018, at 00:15, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com >> <mailto:0x62...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> And how this split looks at Master logs: >> >> Sep 20 19:45:04 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:04,888 INFO >> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t282] master.RegionStates: Transition >> {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 state=OPEN, ts=1537304859509, >> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 >> state=SPLITTING, ts=1537461904888, server=prod >> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,340 INFO >> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Transition >> {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 state=SPLITTING, ts=1537461905340, >> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 >> state=SPLIT, ts=1537461905340, server=pro >> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,340 INFO >> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Offlined >> 3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 from prod013,60020,1537304282885 >> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,341 INFO >> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Transition >> {33cba925c7acb347ac3f5e70e839c3cb state=SPLITTING_NEW, ts=1537461905340, >> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {33cba925c7acb347ac3f5e70e839c3cb >> state=OPEN, ts=1537461905341, server= >> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,341 INFO >> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Transition >> {acb8f16a004a894c8706f6e12cd26144 state=SPLITTING_NEW, ts=1537461905340, >> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {acb8f16a004a894c8706f6e12cd26144 >> state=OPEN, ts=1537461905341, server= >> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,343 INFO >> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.AssignmentManager: Handled SPLIT event; >> parent=IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986., >> daughter a=IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1 >> Sep 20 19:47:41 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:47:41,972 INFO >> [prod001,60000,1537304851459_ChoreService_2] >> balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: Skipping load balancing because balanced >> cluster; total cost is 17.82282205608522, sum multiplier is 1102.0 min cost >> which need balance is 0.05 >> Sep 20 19:47:42 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:47:42,021 INFO >> [prod001,60000,1537304851459_ChoreService_1] hbase.MetaTableAccessor: >> Deleted >> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986. >> Sep 20 19:47:42 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:47:42,022 INFO >> [prod001,60000,1537304851459_ChoreService_1] master.CatalogJanitor: Scanned >> 779 catalog row(s), gc'd 0 unreferenced merged region(s) and 1 unreferenced >> parent region(s) >> >>> On 20 Sep 2018, at 21:43, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:0x62...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Looks like problem was because of index region split >>> >>> Index region split at prod013: >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,441 INFO >>> [regionserver/prod013/10.0.0.13:60020-splits-1537400010677] >>> regionserver.SplitRequest: Region split, hbase:meta updated, and report to >>> master. >>> Parent=IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986., >>> new regions: >>> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1537461904877.33cba925c7acb347ac3f5e70e839c3cb., >>> >>> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200068=4YF!YI,1537461904877.acb8f16a004a894c8706f6e12cd26144.. >>> Split took 0sec >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,441 INFO >>> [regionserver/prod013/10.0.0.13:60020-splits-1537400010677] >>> regionserver.SplitRequest: Split transaction journal: >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: STARTED at 1537461904853 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: PREPARED at 1537461904877 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: BEFORE_PRE_SPLIT_HOOK at >>> 1537461904877 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: AFTER_PRE_SPLIT_HOOK at >>> 1537461904877 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: SET_SPLITTING at >>> 1537461904880 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: CREATE_SPLIT_DIR at >>> 1537461904987 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: CLOSED_PARENT_REGION at >>> 1537461905002 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: OFFLINED_PARENT at >>> 1537461905002 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: STARTED_REGION_A_CREATION at >>> 1537461905056 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: STARTED_REGION_B_CREATION at >>> 1537461905131 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: PONR at 1537461905192 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: OPENED_REGION_A at >>> 1537461905249 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: OPENED_REGION_B at >>> 1537461905252 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: BEFORE_POST_SPLIT_HOOK at >>> 1537461905439 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: AFTER_POST_SPLIT_HOOK at >>> 1537461905439 >>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: COMPLETED at 1537461905439 >>> >>> Index update failed at prod002: >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,520 WARN >>> [hconnection-0x4f3242a0-shared--pool32-t36014] client.AsyncProcess: #220, >>> table=IDX_MARK_O, attempt=1/1 failed=1ops, last exception: >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: Re >>> gion >>> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986. >>> is not online on prod013,60020,1537304282885 >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionServer.getRegionByEncodedName(HRegionServer.java:3081) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.getRegion(RSRpcServices.java:1271) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2365) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:36621) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2359) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:124) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:297) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:277) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: on prod013,60020,1537304282885, >>> tracking started Thu Sep 20 20:09:24 MSK 2018; not retrying 1 - final >>> failure >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,549 INFO >>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] >>> zookeeper.RecoverableZooKeeper: Process identifier=hconnection-0x39beae45 >>> connecting to ZooKeeper ensemble=10.0.0.1:2181,10.0.0.2:2181,10.0.0.3:2181 >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,549 INFO >>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] >>> zookeeper.ZooKeeper: Initiating client connection, >>> connectString=10.0.0.1:2181,10.0.0.2:2181,10.0.0.3:2181 >>> sessionTimeout=90000 >>> watcher=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.PendingWatcher@3ef61f7 >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,562 INFO >>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020-SendThread(10.0.0.3:2181)] >>> zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Opening socket connection to server >>> 10.0.0.3/10.0.0.3:2181. Will not attempt to authenticate using SASL >>> (unknown error) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,570 INFO >>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020-SendThread(10.0.0.3:2181)] >>> zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Socket connection established to >>> 10.0.0.3/10.0.0.3:2181, initiating session >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,572 INFO >>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020-SendThread(10.0.0.3:2181)] >>> zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Session establishment complete on server >>> 10.0.0.3/10.0.0.3:2181, sessionid = 0x30000e039e01c7f, negotiated timeout = >>> 40000 >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,628 INFO >>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] >>> index.PhoenixIndexFailurePolicy: Successfully update >>> INDEX_DISABLE_TIMESTAMP for IDX_MARK_O due to an exception while writing >>> updates. indexState=PENDING_DISABLE >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.exception.MultiIndexWriteFailureException: >>> disableIndexOnFailure=true, Failed to write to multiple index tables: >>> [IDX_MARK_O] >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.write(TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.java:235) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.write(IndexWriter.java:195) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure(IndexWriter.java:156) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure(IndexWriter.java:145) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.doPostWithExceptions(Indexer.java:620) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.doPost(Indexer.java:595) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.postBatchMutateIndispensably(Indexer.java:578) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$37.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1048) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$RegionOperation.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1711) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1789) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1745) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.postBatchMutateIndispensably(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1044) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:3646) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:3108) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:3050) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:916) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:844) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2405) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:36621) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2359) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:124) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:297) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:277) >>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,632 INFO >>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] >>> util.IndexManagementUtil: Rethrowing >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.DoNotRetryIOException: ERROR 1121 (XCL21): Write to >>> the index failed. disableIndexOnFailure=true, Failed to write to multiple >>> index tables: [IDX_MARK_O] ,serverTimestamp=1537463364504, >>> >>> >>>> On 20 Sep 2018, at 21:01, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Our setup: >>>> HBase-1.4.7 >>>> Phoenix-4.14-hbase-1.4 >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 20 Sep 2018, at 20:19, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> Looks live we got dead lock with repeating "ERROR 1120 (XCL20)" >>>>> exception. At this time all indexes is ACTIVE. >>>>> Can you help to make deeper diagnose? >>>>> >>>>> java.sql.SQLException: ERROR 1120 (XCL20): Writes to table blocked until >>>>> index can be updated. tableName=TBL_MARK >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.exception.SQLExceptionCode$Factory$1.newException(SQLExceptionCode.java:494) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.exception.SQLExceptionInfo.buildException(SQLExceptionInfo.java:150) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.validateAndGetServerTimestamp(MutationState.java:815) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.validateAll(MutationState.java:789) >>>>> at org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.send(MutationState.java:981) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.send(MutationState.java:1514) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.commit(MutationState.java:1337) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixConnection$3.call(PhoenixConnection.java:670) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixConnection$3.call(PhoenixConnection.java:666) >>>>> at org.apache.phoenix.call.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:53) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixConnection.commit(PhoenixConnection.java:666) >>>>> at >>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$doUpsert$1(PhoenixDao.scala:103) >>>>> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:209) >>>>> at x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.doUpsert(PhoenixDao.scala:101) >>>>> at >>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$batchInsert$2(PhoenixDao.scala:45) >>>>> at >>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$batchInsert$2$adapted(PhoenixDao.scala:45) >>>>> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.flatMap(Stream.scala:486) >>>>> at >>>>> scala.collection.immutable.Stream.$anonfun$flatMap$1(Stream.scala:494) >>>>> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.$anonfun$append$1(Stream.scala:252) >>>>> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1169) >>>>> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1159) >>>>> at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.length(Stream.scala:309) >>>>> at scala.collection.SeqLike.size(SeqLike.scala:105) >>>>> at scala.collection.SeqLike.size$(SeqLike.scala:105) >>>>> at scala.collection.AbstractSeq.size(Seq.scala:41) >>>>> at scala.collection.TraversableOnce.toArray(TraversableOnce.scala:285) >>>>> at scala.collection.TraversableOnce.toArray$(TraversableOnce.scala:283) >>>>> at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.toArray(Traversable.scala:104) >>>>> at >>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$batchInsert$1(PhoenixDao.scala:45) >>>>> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:209) >>>>> at x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.batchInsert(PhoenixDao.scala:45) >>>>> at >>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$insert$2(PhoenixDao.scala:35) >>>>> at scala.concurrent.Future$.$anonfun$apply$1(Future.scala:655) >>>>> at scala.util.Success.$anonfun$map$1(Try.scala:251) >>>>> at scala.util.Success.map(Try.scala:209) >>>>> at scala.concurrent.Future.$anonfun$map$1(Future.scala:289) >>>>> at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise.liftedTree1$1(Promise.scala:29) >>>>> at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise.$anonfun$transform$1(Promise.scala:29) >>>>> at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:60) >>>>> at >>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) >>>>> at >>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) >>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
