+1
On Sunday, February 13, 2011, Jacob Perkins <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > --jacob > @thedatachef > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > Is anyone who uses HBaseStorage in Pig still on hbase 0.20.6? > There are a number of tickets outstanding to improve HBaseStorage and > I've suggested that we should add a shim layer to work between the > different versions, but it's a big pain to do. I'd rather just move on > to supporting 0.90 only. We just upgraded Twitter's HBase version last > week and it's oh-my-god better in terms of stability, and the upgrade > was pretty smooth.. Objections? > > If everyone is ok with that for Pig 0.9 -- how about Pig 0.8.1? There > are a number of bug fixes for 0.8 already in the branch, and there's a > pretty critical HBaseStorage bug fix that needs to go in, as well. > Would it be too surprising if 0.8 started requiring a different > version of hbase all of a sudden when you upgrade a minor version? > > D > >
