Wilbur is stuck in build limbo. I haven't had time to figure out how to make it modular enough that a wide variety of dependencies can be added and folks can just package the stuff they need, yet keep it easy to contribute to. If anyone wants to help with that, that would be cool.
-----Original Message----- From: "Josh Devins" <[email protected]> To: "Dan Brickley" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: 3/13/2011 2:45 AM Subject: Re: PiggyBank official repo It appears as thought the GitHub repo is pretty much empty anyways. Just wondering if there will be a migration to the GitHub repo or if we should simply ignore it for now. So I suppose I answered my own question: the authoritative PiggyBank source is still the Apache SVN repo :) Josh On 13 March 2011 10:38, Dan Brickley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 March 2011 10:35, Josh Devins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I'm still seeing references (http://wiki.apache.org/pig/PiggyBank) to > > PiggyBank being in the contrib module in SVN. What is the official > PiggyBank > > repo at the moment: GitHub/wilbur/Piggybank or Apache SVN > contrib/piggybank? > > Are they out of sync at the moment/which is the current authoritative > > source? > > FWIW the links in that wiki page to SVN were added by me, because I > couldn't previously find any version easily from the Wiki entry. I > guessed/googled my way there, so it's quite possible github is a > [truncated by sender]
