According to my calculations the biggest TOP number is 2380324
Could that be the reason of failure in maps?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Coveney [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 28 декабря 2011 г. 23:19
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf

How large is TopNumber? I imagine that if your TopNumber is large enough, the 
UDF could still fail if the TopNumber # of values can't fit in the priority 
queue it puts together. Although in that final merge it could be smarter about 
it... will have to check the code when I get a chance to see if they are.

2011/12/27 Ruslan Al-fakikh <[email protected]>

> Actually I fixed it. I had to use an additional grouping to make it 
> really Algebraic. But now I see OutOfMemory during Map merge:
>
> [2011-12-27 08:44:07] FATAL (Child.java:318) - Error running child :
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.IFile$Reader.readNextBlock(IFile.java:355)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.IFile$Reader.next(IFile.java:417)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger$Segment.next(Merger.java:220)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger$MergeQueue.merge(Merger.java:420)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger$MergeQueue.merge(Merger.java:381)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger.merge(Merger.java:77)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.mergeParts(MapTask.java:1548)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.flush(MapTask.java:1180)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.close(MapTask.java:582)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:649)
>         at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:323)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:270)
>        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>        at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1127)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:264)
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ruslan Al-fakikh [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 22 декабря 2011 г. 5:38
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf
>
> Hey guys
>
> I did it according to the advice and moved the TOP execution the map 
> phase and now I am getting the same error, but now it comes from that map 
> phase.
>
> Any help much appreciated!
>
> Here is my current code:
> https://gist.github.com/1508511
>
> Error stack trace:
> [2011-12-21 08:17:46] FATAL (Child.java:318) - Error running child :
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
>        at java.io.DataInputStream.readUTF(DataInputStream.java:644)
>        at java.io.DataInputStream.readUTF(DataInputStream.java:547)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.readCharArray(BinInterSedes.java:210)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.readDatum(BinInterSedes.java:333)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.readDatum(BinInterSedes.java:251)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.addColsToTuple(BinInterSedes.java:555)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.BinSedesTuple.readFields(BinSedesTuple.java:64)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.DefaultDataBag$DefaultDataBagIterator.readFromFile(DefaultDataBag.java:244)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.DefaultDataBag$DefaultDataBagIterator.next(DefaultDataBag.java:231)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.data.DefaultDataBag$DefaultDataBagIterator.hasNext(DefaultDataBag.java:157)
>        at org.apache.pig.builtin.TOP.updateTop(TOP.java:139)
>        at org.apache.pig.builtin.TOP.exec(TOP.java:116)
>        at org.apache.pig.builtin.TOP.exec(TOP.java:65)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.expressionOperators.POUserFunc.getNext(POUserFunc.java:245)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.expressionOperators.POUserFunc.getNext(POUserFunc.java:287)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.relationalOperators.POForEach.processPlan(POForEach.java:338)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.relationalOperators.POForEach.getNext(POForEach.java:290)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.PhysicalOperator.processInput(PhysicalOperator.java:276)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.relationalOperators.POForEach.getNext(POForEach.java:240)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.PhysicalOperator.processInput(PhysicalOperator.java:276)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.relationalOperators.POLocalRearrange.getNext(POLocalRearrange.java:256)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapReduceLayer.PigMapBase.runPipeline(PigMapBase.java:237)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapReduceLayer.PigMapBase.map(PigMapBase.java:232)
>        at
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapReduceLayer.PigMapBase.map(PigMapBase.java:53)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:144)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:647)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:323)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:270)
>        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>        at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1127)
>        at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:264)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 17 декабря 2011 г. 0:16
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf
>
> I meant the latter, an actual join statement. So, generate the counts, 
> join them to the original relation, then group again and do TOP.
>
> D
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Ruslan Al-fakikh < 
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Dmitriy,
> >
> > You wrote
> >
> >> > Ok so this:
> >> >
> >> > thirdLevelsTopVisitorsWithBots = FOREACH thirdLevelsByCategory {
> >> >                                count = COUNT(thirdLevelsSummed);
> >> >                                result = TOP( (int)(count * 
> >> > (double) ($THIRD_LEVELS_PERCENTAGE + $BOTS_PERCENTAGE) ), 3, 
> >> > thirdLevelsSummed);
> >> >                                GENERATE FLATTEN(result); }
> >> >
> >> > requires "count" to be calculated before TOP can be applied. 
> >> > Since count can't be calculated until the reduce side, naturally, 
> >> > TOP can't start working on the map side (as it doesn't know its 
> >> > arguments
> yet). Try generating the counts * ($TLP + $BP) separately, joining 
> them in (I am guessing you have no more than a few K categories -- in 
> that case, you can do a replicated join), and then do group and TOP on.
> >
> > Probably I didn't understand your logic correctly. What I did is:
> > changed this:
> > thirdLevelsTopVisitorsWithBots = FOREACH thirdLevelsByCategory {
> >                                count = COUNT(thirdLevelsSummed);
> >                                result = TOP( (int)(count * (double) 
> > ($THIRD_LEVELS_PERCENTAGE + $BOTS_PERCENTAGE) ), 3, 
> > thirdLevelsSummed);
> >                                GENERATE FLATTEN(result); } to this:
> > thirdLevelsTopNumberCounted = FOREACH thirdLevelsByCategory GENERATE
> >
> > group,
> >
> > thirdLevelsSummed,
> >
> > (int)( COUNT(thirdLevelsSummed) * (double) ($THIRD_LEVELS_PERCENTAGE 
> > +
> > $BOTS_PERCENTAGE) ) AS TopNumber;
> >
> > thirdLevelsTopVisitorsWithBots = FOREACH thirdLevelsTopNumberCounted 
> > GENERATE
> >
> > FLATTEN(TOP(TopNumber, 3, thirdLevelsSummed));
> >
> > So I removed the COUNT from the nested group. It didn't help. 
> > Probably
> you meant the JOIN ... USING 'replicated' statement, but I didn't get 
> how I can apply it here.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ruslan Al-fakikh [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 24 ноября 2011 г. 15:56
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf
> >
> > Hm. Interesting. Yeah, I really haven't seen the error after setting
> mapred.child.java.opts=-Xmx1024m.
> > Probably I won't have to fix the Pig script:)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Coveney [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 23 ноября 2011 г. 11:46
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf
> >
> > I have seen issues with spilling if it had less than 1GB of heap. 
> > Once I
> allocated enough ram, no issues. It seems unlikely to me that the bag 
> implementation fails on this because it's such a common use and nobody 
> has reported an error, and running with less than 1GB of heap is 
> definitely not recommended. Very curious if the error crops up again.
> >
> > 2011/11/22 pablomar <[email protected]>
> >
> >> just a guess .. could it be possible that the Bag is kept in memory 
> >> instead of being spilled to disk ?
> >> browsing the code of InternalCachedBag, I saw:
> >>
> >> private void init(int bagCount, float percent) {
> >>        factory = TupleFactory.getInstance();
> >>        mContents = new ArrayList<Tuple> < 
> >> http://javasourcecode.org/html/open-source/jdk/jdk-6u23/java/util/A
> >> rr
> >> a
> >> yList.java.html
> >> >();
> >>
> >>        long max = Runtime.getRuntime().maxMemory();
> >>        maxMemUsage = (long)(((float)max * percent) / 
> >> (float)bagCount);
> >>        cacheLimit = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
> >>
> >>        // set limit to 0, if memusage is 0 or really really small.
> >>    // then all tuples are put into disk        if (maxMemUsage < 1) {
> >>            cacheLimit = 0;
> >>        }
> >>
> >>        addDone = false;
> >>    }
> >>
> >> my guess is the cacheLimit was set to Integer.MAX_VALUE and it's 
> >> trying to keep all in memory when it is not big enough but not so 
> >> small to have cacheLimit reset to 0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Ruslan Al-fakikh < 
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Jonathan,
> >> >
> >> > I am running it on Prod cluster in MR mode, not locally. I 
> >> > started to see the issue when input size grew. A few days ago I 
> >> > found a workaround of putting this property:
> >> > mapred.child.java.opts=-Xmx1024m
> >> > But I think this is a temporary solution and the job will fail 
> >> > when the input size will grow again.
> >> >
> >> > Dmitriy,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks a lot for the investigation. I'll try it.
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> > Sent: 22 ноября 2011 г. 2:21
> >> > To: [email protected]
> >> > Subject: Re: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf
> >> >
> >> > Ok so this:
> >> >
> >> > thirdLevelsTopVisitorsWithBots = FOREACH thirdLevelsByCategory {
> >> >                                count = COUNT(thirdLevelsSummed);
> >> >                                result = TOP( (int)(count * 
> >> > (double) ($THIRD_LEVELS_PERCENTAGE +
> >> > $BOTS_PERCENTAGE) ), 3, thirdLevelsSummed);
> >> >                                GENERATE FLATTEN(result); }
> >> >
> >> > requires "count" to be calculated before TOP can be applied. 
> >> > Since count can't be calculated until the reduce side, naturally, 
> >> > TOP can't start working on the map side (as it doesn't know its 
> >> > arguments
> yet).
> >> >
> >> > Try generating the counts * ($TLP + $BP) separately, joining them 
> >> > in (I
> >> am
> >> > guessing you have no more than a few K categories -- in that 
> >> > case, you
> >> can
> >> > do a replicated join), and then do group and TOP on.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Jonathan Coveney 
> >> > <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > You're right pablomar...hmm
> >> > >
> >> > > Ruslan: are you running this in mr mode on a cluster, or locally?
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm noticing this:
> >> > > [2011-11-16 12:34:55] INFO  (SpillableMemoryManager.java:154) - 
> >> > > first memory handler call- Usage threshold init =
> >> > > 175308800(171200K) used =
> >> > > 373454552(364701K) committed = 524288000(512000K) max =
> >> > > 524288000(512000K)
> >> > >
> >> > > It looks like your max memory is 512MB. I've had issues with 
> >> > > bag spilling with less than 1GB allocated (-Xmx1024mb).
> >> > >
> >> > > 2011/11/21 pablomar <[email protected]>
> >> > >
> >> > >> i might be wrong, but it seems the error comes from
> >> > >> while(itr.hasNext())
> >> > >> not from the add to the queue
> >> > >> so i don't think it is related to the number of elements in 
> >> > >> the queue ... maybe the field lenght?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 11/21/11, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> > Internally, TOP is using a priority queue. It tries to be 
> >> > >> > smart about pulling off excess elements, but if you ask it 
> >> > >> > for enough elements, it
> >> > >> can
> >> > >> > blow up, because the priority queue is going to have n 
> >> > >> > elements, where n
> >> > >> is
> >> > >> > the ranking you want. This is consistent with the stack 
> >> > >> > trace, which died on updateTop which is when elements are 
> >> > >> > added to the
> >> > priority queue.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Ruslan, how large are the limits you're setting? ie 
> >> > >> > (int)(count
> >> > >> > *
> >> > >> (double)
> >> > >> > ($THIRD_LEVELS_PERCENTAGE + $BOTS_PERCENTAGE) )
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > As far as TOP's implementation, I imagine you could get 
> >> > >> > around the issue
> >> > >> by
> >> > >> > using a sorted data bag, but that might be much slower. hmm.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 2011/11/21 Ruslan Al-fakikh <[email protected]>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >> Ok. Here it is:
> >> > >> >> https://gist.github.com/1383266
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > >> >> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> > >> >> Sent: 21 ноября 2011 г. 20:32
> >> > >> >> To: [email protected]
> >> > >> >> Subject: Re: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Ruslan, I think the mailing list is set to reject 
> >> > >> >> attachments
> >> > >> >> -- can you post it as a github gist or something similar, 
> >> > >> >> and send a
> >> > link?
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> D
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Ruslan Al-Fakikh 
> >> > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> >> > Hey Dmitriy,
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > I attached the script. It is not a plain-pig script, 
> >> > >> >> > because I make some preprocessing before submitting it to 
> >> > >> >> > cluster, but the general idea of what I submit is clear.
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > Thanks in advance!
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy 
> >> > >> >> > <[email protected]>
> >> > >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> Ok, so it's something in the rest of the script that's 
> >> > >> >> >> causing this to happen. Ruslan, if you send your script, 
> >> > >> >> >> I can probably figure out why (usually, it's using 
> >> > >> >> >> another, non-agebraic udf in your foreach, or for pig 
> >> > >> >> >> 0.8, generating a constant in the
> >> > foreach).
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >> >> D
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:59 AM, pablomar 
> >> > >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >>> according to the stack trace, the algebraic is not 
> >> > >> >> >>> being used it says
> >> > >> >> >>> updateTop(Top.java:139)
> >> > >> >> >>> exec(Top.java:116)
> >> > >> >> >>>
> >> > >> >> >>> On 11/17/11, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >>>> The top udf does not try to process all data in memory 
> >> > >> >> >>>> if the algebraic optimization can be applied. It does 
> >> > >> >> >>>> need to keep the topn numbers in memory of course. Can 
> >> > >> >> >>>> you confirm algebraic mode is
> >> > >> >> used?
> >> > >> >> >>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>> On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:13 AM, "Ruslan Al-fakikh"
> >> > >> >> >>>> <[email protected]>
> >> > >> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Hey guys,
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> I encounter java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when using TOP udf.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> It seems that the udf tries to process all data in memory.
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Is there a workaround for TOP? Or maybe there is some 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> other way of getting top results? I cannot use LIMIT 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> since I need to 5% of data, not a constant number of rows.
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> I am using:
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Apache Pig version 0.8.1-cdh3u2 (rexported)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> The stack trace is:
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> [2011-11-16 12:34:55] INFO  (CodecPool.java:128) - 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Got brand-new decompressor
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> [2011-11-16 12:34:55] INFO  (Merger.java:473) - Down 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> to the last merge-pass, with 21 segments left of total size:
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 2057257173 bytes
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> [2011-11-16 12:34:55] INFO
> >> > >> >> >>>>> (SpillableMemoryManager.java:154) - first memory 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> handler
> >> > >> >> >>>>> call- Usage threshold init =
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 175308800(171200K) used =
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 373454552(364701K) committed = 524288000(512000K) max 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> =
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 524288000(512000K)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> [2011-11-16 12:36:22] INFO
> >> > >> >> >>>>> (SpillableMemoryManager.java:167) - first memory 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> handler call - Collection threshold init =
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 175308800(171200K) used =
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 496500704(484863K) committed = 524288000(512000K) max 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> =
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 524288000(512000K)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> [2011-11-16 12:37:28] INFO  
> >> > >> >> >>>>> (TaskLogsTruncater.java:69)
> >> > >> >> >>>>> - Initializing logs'
> >> > >> >> >>>>> truncater with mapRetainSize=-1 and 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> reduceRetainSize=-1
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> [2011-11-16 12:37:28] FATAL (Child.java:318) - Error 
> >> > >> >> >>>>> running
> >> > >> child :
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java.util.Arrays.copyOfRange(Arrays.java:3209)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:215)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java.io.DataInputStream.readUTF(DataInputStream.java:
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 64
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 4
> >> > >> >> >>>>> )
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java.io.DataInputStream.readUTF(DataInputStream.java:
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 54
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 7
> >> > >> >> >>>>> )
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.readCharArray(BinIn
> >> > >> >> >>>>> te
> >> > >> >> >>>>> r
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Sede
> >> > >> >> >>>>> s.java
> >> > >> >> >>>>> :210)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.readDatum(BinInterS
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ed
> >> > >> >> >>>>> e
> >> > >> >> >>>>> s.ja
> >> > >> >> >>>>> va:333
> >> > >> >> >>>>> )
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.readDatum(BinInterS
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ed
> >> > >> >> >>>>> e
> >> > >> >> >>>>> s.ja
> >> > >> >> >>>>> va:251
> >> > >> >> >>>>> )
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.data.BinInterSedes.addColsToTuple(BinI
> >> > >> >> >>>>> nt
> >> > >> >> >>>>> e
> >> > >> >> >>>>> rSed
> >> > >> >> >>>>> es.jav
> >> > >> >> >>>>> a:555)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.data.BinSedesTuple.readFields(BinSedes
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Tu
> >> > >> >> >>>>> p
> >> > >> >> >>>>> le.j
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ava:64
> >> > >> >> >>>>> )
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.data.InternalCachedBag$CachedBagIterator.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> hasN
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ext(In
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ternalCach
> >> > >> >> >>>>> edBag.java:237)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.builtin.TOP.updateTop(TOP.java:139)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.builtin.TOP.exec(TOP.java:116)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.builtin.TOP.exec(TOP.java:65)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> expres
> >> > >> >> >>>>> sionOperat
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ors.POUserFunc.getNext(POUserFunc.java:245)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> expres
> >> > >> >> >>>>> sionOperat
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ors.POUserFunc.getNext(POUserFunc.java:287)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> relati
> >> > >> >> >>>>> onalOperat
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ors.POForEach.processPlan(POForEach.java:338)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> relati
> >> > >> >> >>>>> onalOperat
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ors.POForEach.getNext(POForEach.java:290)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Physic
> >> > >> >> >>>>> alOperator
> >> > >> >> >>>>> .processInput(PhysicalOperator.java:276)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.physicalLayer.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> relati
> >> > >> >> >>>>> onalOperat
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ors.POForEach.getNext(POForEach.java:240)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapRedu
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ce
> >> > >> >> >>>>> L
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ayer
> >> > >> >> >>>>> .PigMa
> >> > >> >> >>>>> pReduce$Re
> >> > >> >> >>>>> duce.runPipeline(PigMapReduce.java:434)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapRedu
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ce
> >> > >> >> >>>>> L
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ayer
> >> > >> >> >>>>> .PigMa
> >> > >> >> >>>>> pReduce$Re
> >> > >> >> >>>>> duce.processOnePackageOutput(PigMapReduce.java:402)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapRedu
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ce
> >> > >> >> >>>>> L
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ayer
> >> > >> >> >>>>> .PigMa
> >> > >> >> >>>>> pReduce$Re
> >> > >> >> >>>>> duce.reduce(PigMapReduce.java:382)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapRedu
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ce
> >> > >> >> >>>>> L
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ayer
> >> > >> >> >>>>> .PigMa
> >> > >> >> >>>>> pReduce$Re
> >> > >> >> >>>>> duce.reduce(PigMapReduce.java:251)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Reducer.run(Reducer.java:
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 17
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 6
> >> > >> >> >>>>> )
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.runNewReducer(ReduceTask.java:
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 572)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:
> >> > >> >> >>>>> 414)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:270)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Method)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Us
> >> > >> >> >>>>> e
> >> > >> >> >>>>> rGro
> >> > >> >> >>>>> upInfo
> >> > >> >> >>>>> rmation.ja
> >> > >> >> >>>>> va:1127)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:264)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> stderr logs
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Exception in thread "Low Memory Detector"
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> sun.management.MemoryNotifInfoCompositeData.getCompos
> >> > >> >> >>>>> it
> >> > >> >> >>>>> e
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Data
> >> > >> >> >>>>> (Memor
> >> > >> >> >>>>> yNotifInfo
> >> > >> >> >>>>> CompositeData.java:42)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> sun.management.MemoryNotifInfoCompositeData.toComposi
> >> > >> >> >>>>> te
> >> > >> >> >>>>> D
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ata(
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Memory
> >> > >> >> >>>>> NotifInfoC
> >> > >> >> >>>>> ompositeData.java:36)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> sun.management.MemoryImpl.createNotification(MemoryImpl.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java
> >> > >> >> >>>>> :168)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> sun.management.MemoryPoolImpl$CollectionSensor.triggerAction(MemoryPoolImpl.
> >> > >> >> >>>>> java:300)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>                at
> >> > >> >> >>>>> sun.management.Sensor.trigger(Sensor.java:120)
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>> Thanks in advance!
> >> > >> >> >>>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>>
> >> > >> >> >>>
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > --
> >> > >> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > >> >> > Ruslan Al-Fakikh
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to