That did not work I get an error of :
Cannot find field coword in groupy:tuple(seedword:chararray,coward:char
array)
IF I try 
FOREACH grouped GENERATE seedword, baggy.groupy;
I also get an error:
Invalid field reference. Referenced field [groupy] does not exist in
schema: seedword:chararray,coward:char array.  (so it does seem to be
ignoring all the nested tuples).

This does seem like a bug!
Can you think of a better solution? I could write a UDF to get rid of the
nested tuples, but that really seems unnecessary.

Thank you

Yulia


On 1/12/12 2:50 PM, "Jonathan Coveney" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hmm, this is an interesting case. I think there may be a bug here.
>
>grunt> grouped = load 'thing' as
>(seedword:chararray,baggy:{outertup:(groupy:(seedword:chararray,
>coword:chararray))});
>grunt> describe grouped;
>grouped: {seedword: chararray,baggy: {groupy: (seedword: chararray,coword:
>chararray)}}
>
>notice that outertup has been thrown out. I suppose having a bunch of
>nested tuples is equivalent to getting rid of them, still, it's not
>something that pig should do. For the Pig devs, is this expected?
>
>Either way. in this case, you would do:
>
>a = foreach grouped generate seedword, baggy.coword;
>
>and go for there
>
>let me know if that works
>
>2012/1/12 Yulia Tolskaya <[email protected]>
>
>> I have been stuck on this for several hours and I cannot figure out
>>what I
>> am doing wrong. I have a relation "grouped" with the schema of
>>
>>  grouped: {seedword: chararray,baggy: {outertup: (groupy: (seedword:
>> chararray,coword: chararray))}}
>>
>> I need to generate just the seedword and a tuple of cowords. In my
>>example
>> I would want
>>
>> (auto, (car, truck)).
>>
>> I have tried:
>>
>>  FOREACH grouped GENERATE baggy::outertup.groupy.coword;
>>
>>  FOREACH grouped GENERATE baggy.outertup.groupy.coword;
>>  FOREACH grouped GENERATE baggy.groupy.coword;
>>
>>
>> and none of these (or other similar variations) work, and give me error
>> messages saying there is no such field. I"m assuming there has to be a
>>way
>> to do this. Please help!!
>>
>>
>> Yulia
>>
>>

Reply via email to