Makes sense, but I personally don't think it would be worth the effort. The Pivot JARs you might typically want to use on the server include Core and Web, and these are pretty small (180k and 29k). Even WTK and Terra are pretty small, and they aren't likely to be used on the server often.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Sandro Martini wrote: > Hi Greg, > thanks for the info, but my idea was to share the same jars used in > the server-side part (why not also Pivot itself ?), because I've seen > in many projects that if possible the client-side part deployed with a > webapp is done using the same jars of the server-side, duplicating > them, so the trick, like a symbolic link in UNIX. > > Just a little idea, maybe could be useful to someone ... and I'm > interesting to see what users (and developers of course) say on this > ... comments are always welcome. > > Bye
