Yup. More specifically, you'll call Sequence.Tree.get(treeView.getTreeData(), paths.get(i)) (assuming you didn't choose to cache such intermediate calls in local variables).
-T On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Robert Piotrowski <[email protected]>wrote: > > http://pivot.apache.org/1.3/docs/api/org/apache/pivot/collections/Sequence.Tree.html#get%28org.apache.pivot.collections.Sequence,%20org.apache.pivot.collections.Sequence.Tree.Path%29 > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:08 PM, David McNelis < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Greg. >> >> >> >> I think I’m on the right track, but I’m missing something clear I think. >> Here is my snippet: >> >> >> >> *public* *void* selectedPathsChanged(TreeView arg0, Sequence<Path> paths) >> { >> >> Sequence.Tree<TreeNode> tree = *new* Sequence.Tree<TreeNode>(); >> >> >> >> >> *for*(*int* i, n=paths.getLength(); i < n; i++){ >> >> >> >> TreeNode node = *tree.get(paths, paths.get(i))*; >> >> >> >> } >> >> >> >> I tried casting the tree.get() to a TreeNode, but that didn’t work, as the >> get is still bringing back a path. >> >> >> >> David >> >> >> >> *From:* Greg Brown [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:44 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: TreeViews, Nodes and Paths >> >> >> >> Hi David, >> >> >> >> You can use the get() method of org.apache.pivot.collections.Sequence.Tree >> to access your tree nodes by path. >> >> >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:33 PM, David McNelis wrote: >> >> >> >> I have just changed a single select TreeView to a Multi, and am having >> some issues. >> >> >> >> Before I was able to use TreeView and the getSelectedNode() method, but >> clearly that doesn’t apply to this situation. >> >> >> >> The getSelectedPaths() seems to be the logical direction to go, but how to >> I retrieve the selected node(s) itself from there? There is not a >> getNode(Path) method and the getNodeAt(int) returns another path. >> >> >> >> I’m I missing something obvious? Or is this really not as straightforward >> as it would seem. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance for any suggestions. >> >> >> >> >> > >
