Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
However, I think the "Resources" name clash would cause confusion, so I think it would be preferable to stick with the existing terminology and not attempt to support JSR-250 (the end result is the same either way).
The (now dead) Swing Application Framework (SAF) called it "ResourceMap" to avoid the confusion.
This is for Pivot 2.0, isn't it? +1 for renaming Resources to ResourceMap and to support those parts of JSR-250. This makes it easier for newbies: if a new user sees the the @Resource annotation in Pivot code the first time, he knows immediately what this means. The @BXML annotation doesn't say anything.
Dirk.
