> Note that it's possible to do this:
>
> public <T> List<T> getList() {
> return (List<T>)ts;
> }
>
> without the ghastly Class<T> paramYeah, that's the approach that I would prefer. > Of course, this has the same problem of errors only showing up at > runtime, and in a depressingly high number of cases, you still need to > specify the <T> using Java's weird syntax - listView.<Foo>getList(). I had never even seen that syntax until recently. It IS really weird. G
