OK, thanks for clarifying. Why a gadget as opposed to a regular application?
On May 10, 2011, at 11:51 AM, noobmike wrote: > To gk_brown: > > I think they are considered "widgets" for OSX and "gadgets" for Windows. > These are some of the things I mean. My goal is to develop some for learning > purposes. I.E a translator for someone taking a language course. Or an Atlas > for someone taking a geography course... etc. Here is a website with > something along the lines of what I'm trying to do. > > http://www.redmondpie.com/top-5-must-have-desktop-gadgets-for-windows-7/ > > To Roger: > > I think so, but I would be doing it for the Windows equivalent. I do have a > mac as well and could use that, but the person who I am researching for > wants windows "widgets" although I believe she meant "gadgets" now that I > have dove deeper into this topic. > > thanks, > > Mike. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-pivot-users.399431.n3.nabble.com/widgets-tp2923280p2923576.html > Sent from the Apache Pivot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
