FYI, the original code can still be found under the 1.5 tag in SVN.

On Jun 24, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Greg Brown wrote:

>>> We actually used to have an open preview event in addition to close 
>>> preview. An open preview event would solve this problem, since you could 
>>> populate your menu in response to that event.
>> Why was it removed?
> 
> We didn't think there was a use case for it.
> 
>> Would it be a good idea to reintroduce it?
> 
> Since there actually does seem to be a use case for it, I would say yes.  :-)
> 
>> This is not a big issue for me, I can live with a workaround for now, but it 
>> would be nice for "completeness".
> 
> I agree.
> 
> 

Reply via email to