W dniu 31.12.2011 16:44, Sandro Martini pisze:
Hi Piotr,
as your other question, we will look at it just after the 2.0.1
released (at least me, maybe others can have some time before).
Don't know why my previous proposition of memoizing the buffer has been applied
only to VolatileImage and not also to BufferedImage. :(
Because we wasn't sure that the fix was good in all cases (if I
remember well, Chris had some problems in one application), and with
an important maintenance release as 2.0.1 (we are working on it since
January 2011) and many applications based on it from many companies
... we chose a safer approach, but we will restart to look at it in
2.0.2 .
Thank you for the patch for now, and Happy New Year even to you.
Sandro
Ok, no problem. Go ahead with the 2.0.1 release without my patches.
I'd like to see bugfixing releases more often. Almost one year for a 2.0
-> 2.0.1 is very very long, and it actually forces us to use versions
from trunk. Really, from outside it looks like the project is dead.
Regards,
Piotr
--
Piotr Kołaczkowski
senior consultant
Sages Sp. z o.o.
ul. Wąwozowa 11
02-796 Warszawa
t: +48 22 2035600
f: +48 22 2035601
m: +48 609618449
