Hi Karel,
Definitely that is one thing I've been looking at with our application -- lots and lots of boilerplate code for listeners and registering listeners, and tons of POJOs just to hold values for the GUI, which are then transferred to the "real" objects.... I'd like to have some automatic ways to register listeners, and then be able to use Lambdas or closures for handling events (property change notifications).

So, sounds like we're pretty much on the same page with this (or am I off base still?).... Feel free to share other thoughts as you see things.

Thanks,
~Roger

On 1/20/15 6:27 AM, Karel Hübl wrote:

Hi Roger,

We plan to use Pivot with Groovy in our next project. Expected use cases:

-Use closures instead of annonymous inner classes adapting common Pivot interfaces – typically component listeners, asynchronous actions

-Use groovy beans for property bindable models. Now we use POJO’s, so we need to implement model POJO, model property listener and property change notification in POJO. We expect, we could intercept property changes in Groovy using GroovyInterceptable.setProperty() and implement org.apache.pivot.collections.Map on groovy bean parent / trait. The goal is to be able to declare strictly properties on groovy model classes and do not implement (boilerplate) support for Pivot property change notifications.

May be, the first use case could be somehow supported in future Pivot versions. I mean Pivot developers could have option to handle events of Pivot components by setting Lambda (Closure) handlers instead of implementing and registering custom listeners.

Regards Karel

*From:* Roger Whitcomb [mailto:roger.whitc...@actian.com]
*Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 12:21 AM
*To:* Pivot Users; 'd...@pivot.apache.org'
*Subject:* Anyone using ...?

Hi,

I’m curious about anyone using Pivot with either Java 8 Lambdas, or using Pivot with Scala or Groovy. If you are could you let us know with a few comments about your experiences (good or bad)?

Basically thinking about changes / extensions to Pivot that we could work on for future versions to more easily / compactly support these newer languages.

Thanks,

~Roger Whitcomb


Reply via email to