They were just officially donated. Will take time to house and release though 
so use the old ones for now.


On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Gustavo Frederico 
<gustavo.freder...@thinkwrap.com> wrote:

I would like to see the current SDKs as integral part of the new
Apache distribution. Is that possible?

Thanks
Gustavo

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> Which brings up the next set of issues: What do we do for Salesforce owned
> SDKs? Can the SDKs be donated?
> 
> In any case I suggest we add to the “gallery” so it might be better
> categorized to include SDKs, Templates, other extras like containers or
> whatnot. If we are agreed about external templates then we could treat SDKs
> and the rest in the same manner.
> 
> 1) PR to the Gallery page to request inclusion
> 2) Committer reviews and pushes the change if the inclusion seems worthwhile
> and includes a link to some support. License type is irrelevant since we are
> not publishing any of this, only descriptions and links.
> 3) Donations of the work can be processed if there is a provision for
> continued support by a current committer or by the author and all other due
> process is followed.
> 
> That way if the Salesforce owned SDKs are donated—great. If not we still can
> put them or some fork of them in the Gallery.
> 
> Sound good?
> 
> 
> On Sep 11, 2016, at 1:09 AM, Kenneth Chan <kenn...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I think the Java SDK already supports it creating events to a file, but it's
> not documented.
> https://github.com/PredictionIO/PredictionIO-Java-SDK/commit/6691144ebf1382aa1d060770a4fb7c0268f849d3
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The page is now live
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Gustavo Frederico
>> <gustavo.freder...@thinkwrap.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The page at
>> http://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/datacollection/batchimport/
>> displays "(coming soon)" for the Java SDK. Any ideas about when that will
>> happen?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Gustavo
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to