Awesome, thanks!

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:16, Madhan Neethiraj <mad...@apache.org> wrote:

> RangerBaseService.lookupResource() is called within Ranger Admin to
> provide auto-complete values as the user enters a resource name in policy
> UI – for example a Hive table name.
>
>   Input:
>
>     - ResourceLookupContext.userInput: value currently being entered in UI
>
>     - ResourceLookupContext.resourceName: name of the resource, as defined
> in service-def, like database/table/column/path
>
>     - ResourceLookupContext.resources: values already present in policy
> UI. This can be useful for example 1) to scope the search for table names
> within the database already entered in the policy 2) to avoid returning
> values that are already present in the policy
>
>
>
>   Return:
>
>     - list of auto-complete values to show in the UI
>
>
>
> RangerBaseService.validateConfig() is called to validate service-config
> values. For example url/username/password entered in service-config that
> are used to connect to the service (like HiveServer2, NameNode). Following
> entries are expected in the returned map:
>
> - connectivityStatus: true/false
>
> - description: any other information on validation success/failure
>
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> Madhan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Elliot West <tea...@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *<user@ranger.apache.org>
> *Date: *Monday, October 5, 2020 at 10:52 AM
> *To: *<user@ranger.apache.org>
> *Subject: *RangerBaseService contract
>
>
>
> Hello, I'm implementing my own service and was wondering if anyone can
> point me in the direction of the contract for the abstract methods in
> RangerBaseService. In particular I'm keen to know what behaviour and return
> values I should provide for:
>
>    - List<String> lookupResource(ResourceLookupContext)
>    - Map<String, Object> validateConfig()
>
> And what can I expect to find in:
>
>    - ResourceLookupContext.userInput
>    - ResourceLookupContext.resourceName
>    - ResourceLookupContext.resources - Map<String, List<String>>
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
> Elliot.
>

Reply via email to